THE TEACHING
OF DJWHAL KHUL
Book 3
ASTRONOMY AND
COSMOLOGY
* * * * *
The series
ESOTERIC NATURAL
SCIENCE
* * * * *
The Teaching of the Master of the Trans-Himalayan Esoteric School,
Djwhal Khul. The continuation of books of HP Blavatsky and AA Bailey. Synthesis
of Science and Religion
* * * * *
TATIANA DANINA
* * * * *
AMAZON KINDLE EDITION
* * * * *
The Teaching of Djwhal Khul – Astronomy and cosmology
Copyright © 2014
Translation from Russian by Tatiana Danina
The contact
information https://authorcentral.amazon.com/gp/books?ie=UTF8&pn=irid58388648
danina.t@yandex.ru - e-mail
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/tatiana.danina
Vkontakte: https://vk.com/t.danina
The books of the series “The Teaching of
Djwhal Khul – Esoteric Natural Science” - “The main occult laws and concepts”
- http://www.amazon.com/Main-Occult-Laws-Concepts
-ebook/dp/B00GUJJR72
“Ethereal mechanics” - http://www.amazon.com/The-Doctrine-Djwhal-Khul-mechanics-ebook/dp/B00I8KSY8Y (paperback - https://www.createspace.com/4836813)
“New Esoteric Astrology,
1” - http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00JF6RMCY
(paperback - https://www.createspace.com/4827294)
“Thermodynamics” - http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00KGHK8EU (paperback - https://www.createspace.com/4838412)
And
here is the book of my grandpa, Michael Novikov, a military paramedic.
You can read his memories about the Finnish war http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00JYDITQ6
We wish you enthralling reading!
CONTENTS
01. The dispute between theories of heating and
cooling the planet.
02. Nuclei of Galaxies and stars – a comparative
characteristic.
03. The mechanism of rotation of planets.
04. On what does the heating of planets by stars, of stars
by galactic nuclei and of nuclei of galaxies by nuclei of supergalaxies affect?
05. Reasons for beginning of the rotation of planets.
06. Retrograde and prograde rotation of planets.
07. The seasonal (exoteric) and astronomical
(esoteric) classification of months.
08. Distances of the planets from the Sun.
09. The cause of elliptical shape of orbits of the
planets.
10. “Planets are fried on a skewer”.
11. The reason of precession of the equinoxes.
12. The mechanism of cooling of the surface layers of a
planet.
13. A gradual increase in the angle of inclination of
the axis of rotation of planets.
14. The Earth's gravity decreases with time.
15. The speed of rotation of planets - what is the
reason.
16. The causes of discrepancies continents and
separation of Pangaea.
17. Dependence of intensity of solar radiation from
the latitude of the sun.
18. The reason for existence of rings at the giant
planets.
19. The final goal of the evolution of life on the Earth.
20. A commentary to the cosmological hypothesis.
21. The reason of absence of the atmosphere on the
moon.
22. What is a comet?
23. Formation of planets in the solar system.
24. The reason of tides is not gravitation of the
moon, and the pressure of the heated by the Sun atmosphere.
25. Cepheids are double stars.
01. THE DISPUTE
BETWEEN THEORIES OF HEATING AND COOLING THE PLANET
A theme of global warming is one of the most popular
issues currently being debated not only in scientific but also in the social
circles. However, this issue is inextricably linked with the theme of ice ages.
Yes, warmings and coolings because happening now in the world global warming is
not the first in the history of the Earth. As well as the Ice Age was not the
only one.
The theme of cooling and warming is closely
intertwined with another scientific problem. A very long time (at least
throughout the XX century) in science, there is a dispute between supporters of
two concepts. Some people believe that the Earth cools, others – that it is
heated. This question is really very difficult to analyze because both we have
to consider at the same time an incredibly large number of astronomical,
climatic, physical, chemical and biological factors. And besides in addition to
the dispute between supporters of heating and cooling there is another division
of opinion - within the concept of warming earth. Some scientists attribute the
warming of the Earth to the action of only physicochemical factors - for
example, of "heat generation due to gravitational compression of the
planet". Others blame only “the human factor” – i.e. an increasing of
"greenhouse effect" due to the growing in atmospheric levels of
carbon dioxide in the combustion of various fuels.
Let's look who is right – i.e. is the Earth cool or
heat, and what causes of one or the other. And we will say immediately - as it is
often in science (and not only in science) the truth includes all (or almost
all) existing points of view, at first glance, seeming contradictory. All the
matter is that the Earth simultaneously heats and cools. Heating causes are as
natural physicochemical factors, both natural and anthropogenic. Plus -
biological.
After the Earth was formed from the solar material – it
has been thrown out of the sun in outer space in the form of a giant drop of
hot matter - it began to cool. The fact is that when the substance of the
planet was in the depths of the Sun it was subjected to more significant
transformation by gravitation much greater than it happens in the depths of the
planets themselves.
So, the surface of arising planet first began to cool.
Interior of the Earth (and of any other planet) cool down much less because to
center the planet degree of transformation of elementary particles in chemical
elements by means of gravitation increase.
So, the planets after leaving the Sun (star) start to
cool, and primarily the surface layers exposed to the cooling. As you can see
proponents of cooling the Earth are right - but only on half.
However, after leaving the Sun the planets begin to be
exposed to such a powerful heating factor as elementary particles emitted by
the Sun. Any star heats up "its" planets with the help of emitted elementary
particles. The heating is provided in two ways:
1) Collisions of emitted particles with chemical
elements in the composition of the planet;
2) Chemical elements of the planet accumulate (absorb)
solar particles. More than half of reaching the planet solar elementary
particles has Repulsion Fields. Most of them are the photons with Repulsion
Fields belonging to the radio, micro frequency and visible ranges. Just this
kind of particles with Repulsion Fields accumulated by chemical elements in the
composition of the planet increase the total temperature of chemical elements.
These two ways of heating the particles of the planet by
the solar particles differ from each other by the time during which the elevated
temperature persists. We can consider a collision as a short-term way to raise
the temperature. While accumulation (absorption) of particles with Repulsion
Fields - it's not just a long-term way, and the way leading to the total
heating substance of the planet not disappearing with time. It is this second
factor has a major warming effect.
Solar particles meeting on the way the planet behave
differently. They all follow influenced by the Field of Attraction of the
planet. Some part of them is reflected immediately as a result of collisions
with chemical elements of the planet. Other - remains in the upper layers of
the atmosphere as a part of the ionosphere. Third - is absorbed by elements of
all layers of the atmosphere. Fourth – is absorbed by elements of solid and
liquid substances on the surface of the planet. However, ultimately the fate of
most particles absorbed by the elements - to move from element to element, down
toward the planet's center, subject to the action of its attraction.
By the way, the cooling of the surface layers of the
planet, which happens every night, in cold weather, in cold climate and during
the cold season caused by the fact that accumulated by elements solar particles
with Repulsion Fields go down towards the center of the planet. And new solar
particles at this time or do not come at all (at night), or come a little (in
the cold season, in cold climates, and in cold weather). But this cold - it's
just the return of chemical elements in the surface layers of the planet to their
natural state, which is inherent for them out of the process of transformation
by the solar particles.
It turns out that supporters of both concepts are
right in their own way. Leaving the Sun the planets cooled though not completely.
To the center - the temperature is maintained at a high level, although lower
than it was when the substance was part of the Sun. However, the cooling of the
planets is prevented the heating them by the particles with Fields of Repulsion
emitted by the Sun. Solar particles "settle" in the first turn, in
the center of the planets. The farther from the center, the less solar
particles are accumulated in the elements, so to the periphery of the planets
the temperature of substance decreases. Although we should not forget that to the
center of any celestial body temperature rises due to the transformation by
gravity.
People need to stop blaming others and themselves that
someone or something disturbs them to exist. We just survive and adapt. We do
not know for what we are doing this, but that is the whole point of our lives. The
life is so mysterious. Each of us has own view of the world, but in general
this knowledge is negligible. And we do not realize of what we are the part. We
can say a million times - "God", "Creator". But this is not
one iota reveal to us the essence of this Aught. So why we do not just go
through life knowing that everything is subject to change. And if you're
unhappy now, it does not mean that it always will be.
As you will soon know, the people - these are especial
animals, and we are ordained our own path of development.
02. NUCLEI OF
GALAXIES AND STARS - A COMPARATIVE CHARACTERISTIC
To begin with, in the center of any galaxy there is a celestial
body. We call it as a Nucleus of the galaxy. The size of any nucleus of the
galaxy is much larger than any star. Nuclei of galaxies are formed from
material ejected from the bowels of even larger by size celestial bodies – Nuclei
of Super galaxies.
The Nucleus of any Super galaxy first begets Nuclei of
galaxies of the largest size – i.e. containing more chemical elements than
others.
The greater is the number of chemical elements in the
composition of a celestial body, the higher is the degree of transformation of
the particles of elements of this celestial body - i.e. the greater is the
overall temperature of the substance. Thus larger celestial bodies have the
higher temperature compared with smaller. Of course it’s provided that the
original chemical composition of celestial bodies was identical. For example,
the temperature of the Nucleus of any galaxy is always greater than the temperature
of substance of any star generated by this Nucleus. Or the temperature of
substance of any star is always higher than the temperature of even the largest
of the planets. And the reason for that – is a smaller number of chemical
elements in stars compared to galactic nuclei, as well as in planets compared
to stars.
But let’s back to where we started. The largest nuclei
of galaxies having in their composition most of all of chemical elements
generated first. And the explanation is following.
Any Galactic Nucleus in the most beginning of its life
has in its composition more chemical elements than it has now. The more
substance is in the celestial body, the higher is the temperature of the
substance - i.e. in the most degree the particles of its elements are
transformed – i.e. the faster the particles with Fields of repulsion emit Ether.
And besides that in the initial stage of the life of the galactic nucleus its chemical
elements were richer by particles with Fields of Repulsion. All this taken
together leads to the fact that in the early Nucleus of the Galaxy chemical
elements had the higher temperature – i.e. their mass was smaller and the antimass
was more than later (and for example, now). And that's why more number of
chemical elements was expiring from the Nucleus moving away from its center. Of
this expiring substance the stars just were forming. And accordingly those
earlier stars absorb more substance. I.e. the stars that were formed first
contained more chemical elements. And besides that the substance of earlier
stars was more ornate by particles with Fields of Repulsion.
The same can be said of the nuclei of galaxies. Those of
them that have arisen before contained a larger number of chemical elements.
And chemical elements themselves were richer by particles with Fields of
Repulsion. Therefore, the early nucleus of the galaxies were larger than latest
– i.e. had in their composition more chemical elements.
To confirm these considerations we give the following
facts.
There are two main types of galaxies: elliptical
and spiral.
Here are their characteristics. “About 25% of studied galaxies have a circular
or elliptical shape. Therefore they are called elliptical galaxies (in the
classification this type of galaxies is denoted by E). These are the simplest
systems in structure, star composition and nature of internal motions. In them
there are not found of stars with high luminosity (supergiants), the brightest
stars in elliptical galaxies - red giants. ... Depending on the degree of
visible compression, elliptical nebulas are divided into eight subtypes: from
the spherical systems E0 to lentiform E7 (the number indicates the degree of
compression)” (“Physics of Space”, the article “Galaxies”, main editor - prof. SB
Pikel'ner).
“The other most common type of galaxies (about 50%) has
very diverse structures. These star systems have two or more ragged spiral arms
forming a flat area of the "disk", and in the center of the galaxy
there is located a spheroidal core. They are called spiral and are denoted by S
symbol” (ibid. – “Physics of Space”, the article “Galaxies”).
As is known, in spiral galaxies the blue giants are
and they are located on the outskirts of these galaxies in their arms.
Naturally, in these galaxies there are many of the red giants, which are closer
to the nuclei of galaxies.
The heated substance that glows with blue light has a
higher temperature than the incandescent substance that glows with red. It can
be concluded that the blue giants are hotter than red. And the temperature of big blue stars
is explained by the large number of chemical elements in their composition,
which automatically entails a larger value of the degree of transformation of
particles in elements. Accordingly, the less temperature of red stars is
explained by the lesser number of chemical elements in the composition of these
stars and the lesser degree of transformation of particles.
And now immediately let’s turn to the analysis of
galactic nuclei.
As was said above we can identify two main types of
galaxies - elliptical and spiral. Elliptical have the shape of a ball or an
ellipse, and spiral are lens-shaped with arms. The wide part of ellipse of elliptical
galaxies is an area from which to further the arms will grow like in spiral
galaxies (although not as big). And the arms of spiral galaxies and the
thickening of the ellipse in elliptical galaxies are located in the same plane
as the equatorial plane of the galaxy nucleus.
As is known, only red giants are observed among the
stellar population of elliptical galaxies, and there no blue giants. What can
tell us this fact? About that the Nuclei of those Galaxies that now have an
elliptical shape initially contained a relatively small number of chemical
elements (compared with the nuclei of spiral galaxies). It is a small number of
chemical elements in their composition has not allowed them to have such large
temperature of the material to throw out from themselves a large number of
chemical elements. And as a result stars formed from material ejected by the
Nuclei of such of galaxies did not contain initially so many chemical elements
in order the temperature of the substance of these stars matches the blue
luminosity. While in the spiral galaxies blue giants are much enough and they
are located as has been said on the outskirts of these galaxies in their arms.
This means that those nuclei whose Galaxy now have a spiral shape, originally
had in their composition enough chemical elements to produce stars with a large
content of substance. And this led eventually to a greater degree of
transformation and to the blue luminosity. That's why blue giants are in the spiral
galaxies.
Now let's talk about the relationship between the
shape of galaxies, the numerical composition of their nuclei and the age of them.
So, we found that spiral galaxies are older and elliptical -
younger. This means that any Galaxy early in his life had a circular
shape. Then its shape gradually begins more and more to resemble a lentils. And
in the future the Galaxy gradually transforms into the flat disc with arms. I.e.
elliptical galaxy becomes a spiral. Obviously, the lentiform shape indicates
the beginning of the formation of a flat disc with arms. So why have more
ancient galaxies which we call the spiral a flat disc with arms and younger -
elliptic - this or not at all (round) or a flat disc is in the bud (lentiform)?
Here is an answer to this question. Fact is that at
the center of any galaxy there is a celestial body – a Nucleus of Galaxy. All Nuclei
of Galaxies are generated by one or another Nucleus of Supergalaxy. And a Nucleus
of Supergalaxy as any celestial body larger than the planet emits elementary
particles. These elementary particles, reaching Nuclei of Galaxies, are
accumulated in the substance of Nuclei (on the surface of chemical elements and
in empty space between them). Between elementary particles emitted by Nuclei of
Super galaxies (and by any other celestial bodies), the particles with Fields
of Repulsion (red) predominate. Thus, there is an increase of the total Field
of Repulsion of Nuclei of Galaxies.
Nuclei of Galaxies rotate around their axes as well as
planets and stars. And the reason for this rotation is the heating from the side
of the generated them celestial body. In this case, the Nuclei of Galaxies are
heated by radiation of the Nuclei of Supergalaxies generated them. At any Nucleus
of Galaxy (as well as at stars and planets) their rotation axis is
perpendicular to the straight passing through the center of the Galaxy Nucleus
and the center of the Supergalaxy Nucleus generated it. It is for this reason the
area of equator (of a Nucleus of Galaxy or of a star or of a planet) is heated
by radiation in the greatest extent – i.e. accumulates the most amount of free
particles with Repulsion Fields. In this case, the poles of Nuclei of Galaxies
(or stars, or planets) are the least heated areas. As a result, the total
gravity field of equator is the smallest, and of the poles is the largest. With
the passage of time until the Nucleus of Galaxy is moving around the Nucleus of
Supergalaxy and continues to accumulate free particles, this imbalance “equator/pole”
has been increasing. The Field of Attraction at the equator more decreases and
temperature of the substance, on the contrary, increases. An increase in
temperature of the substance at the equator leads to the fact that it is this
region of the Galaxy Nucleus throws out of itself most of all substance. And of
this substance in the future the stars will arise that form the silhouette of
the Galaxy.
Why do the stars formed from ejected material, tend to
align along the same plane (form a flat disc) corresponding to the equatorial
plane of the Galaxy Nucleus? Yes, because at the same time the total Field of
Attraction of both poles effect on these stars. More specifically, not only of poles
but also of entire substance of each of two hemispheres on each side of the
equatorial plane. The Nucleus of Galaxy, as any celestial body formed from the incandescent
material has a very symmetrical shape. One hemisphere is almost 100 % identical
to another. As a result, the values of total Attraction Fields of both
hemispheres are equal. And the stars, ejected from the Galactic Nucleus, “feel”
this. I.e. they are equally controlled by the attraction of each of two
hemispheres. That's why the stars tend to align in the form of a thin disk
along the equatorial plane of a Galaxy Nucleus. If it was not – i.e.
there would be no "control" as an action of Attraction Fields of both
hemispheres - all Galaxies would have only a circular shape, there would be nor
lentiform, nor spiral.
03. THE
MECHANISM OF ROTATION OF PLANETS
Before we will talk about the reasons that cause the
planets to rotate around their own axis, let us recall some features of their
structure.
Dense and liquid part of any celestial body of the planetary
type manifests outside an Attractive Field. This is explained by the fact that among
the chemical elements of dense or liquid substances there are predominantly
those that exhibit outwards Fields of Attraction. And the value of these Fields
of Attraction is the highest in comparison, for example, with the same liquid
substance.
As we already know, the value of any Field (and of
Attraction and of Repulsion) decreases with distance. This means that during the
distancing from the solid or liquid surface of the planet, the value of its Fields
of Attraction decreases. This means that there occurs the decrease of the Force
of Attraction to the planet occurring in other bodies, and makes them strive to
fall on the planet. That is why, the farther from the surface of the planet a
spaceship is moving away, the smaller is the value of the Force of Attraction
amount occurring in it to the planet – i.e. the less it “feels” its attraction.
As for the chemical elements of the atmosphere of the
planet, they exhibit outward or very small Fields of Attraction, either neutral
or Fields of Repulsion. If the elements-gases accumulate on their surface free
solar particles (among which there is a domination of the particles with the Fields
of Repulsion), then they do not exhibit outward any Field of Attraction. Thus, the
elements of the atmosphere, being even slightly heated by the accumulation of
particles with Fields Repulsion begin to demonstrate outward Fields of
Repulsion – i.e. they emit Ether (energy). And as a result, the
chemical elements of the atmosphere shield the chemical elements of the dense and
liquid part of the planet, reducing the outward manifestation of the Gravity Field
of the planet.
However, note your attention, none of the celestial
body (including the planet) doesn’t exhibit outward Field of Repulsion itself,
without heating. Only Field of Attraction. And Field of Repulsion appears only
as a result of the heating from a celestial body that generates it. In the case
of the planets, they are heated by the stars generating them.
It is the appearance at a heavenly body a Field of Repulsion
is the cause of its rotation about its own axis. In particular, that’s why the planets and stars rotate.
Star emits elementary particles. The particles with
Fields of Repulsion predominate among the emitted particles. When the star
emits these particles, they move by inertia until they reach any of the
planets. There, they are accumulated on the surfaces of the elements in the
chemical composition of these planets. And this process of accumulation begins
from the elements of the atmosphere. Namely atmospheric elements play a major
role in a forming of the Field of Repulsion of the planet. Point is that, as
already mentioned, the chemical elements of the atmosphere exhibit outward or
weak Field of Attraction, either neutral, or even Field of Repulsion. So, when
these elements accumulate on the surface solar particles (among which the
particles with Fields of Repulsion predominate), they begin to exhibit outward the
Field of Repulsion.
Moreover, the solar particles themselves are accumulated
in the upper layers of the atmospheres of planets, in the ionosphere, held by
the action of the total Field of Attraction of the planet.
As a result, in those regions of the atmosphere (or of
the surface as on Mercury), which are currently turned to the star (i.e. lighted
by it), the whole totality of accumulated particles with Fields of Repulsion
forms the total Field of Repulsion. This Field of Repulsion is an “ethereal
shield”. Namely this “shield” hinders the process of rapprochement of
the planet with the star. In other words, namely this arising Field of Repulsion
(emitted ether) just also and prevents to drop of the planets on the star - for
example, on the Sun! If the Sun did not emit elementary particles, all the
planets would have fallen on it (on the Sun). As also in the area of
the planet, turned at the moment to the star (i.e. it is located from the
center of the star at a minimum distance) there arises a Field of Repulsion
(ethereal shield), this area begins to move away from the star. And there is no
distancing of the whole planet from the star. No, instead this, only the heated
area turns away from the star. The neighboring area of the planet that all this
time was on the night side and is cooled, so do not have the same ethereal
shield. This means that this area exhibits outwards the Field of Attraction – i.e.
absorbs ether. And so this area gravitates to the star and seeks to be closer.
It turns out that at the same time as the heated area tends to
move away from the star, the area cooled on the night side, by contrast, tends
to fall on the star. And finally there occurs a rotation of the planet around
its own axis. And this is constantly. As soon as the Field of Repulsion
(ethereal shield) arises in the heated region of the planet, the planet
rotates, substituting to the star to heat another “side”.
That's how we can briefly describe the mechanism of
rotation of any planet in the composition of our solar system, or in any other
solar system with another sun.
Stars also rotate around their axis, since they are
heated by the radiation of the Nucleus of the Galaxy. Nuclei of Galaxies are
also rotate due to the heating by Nuclei of Supergalaxies.
04. ON WHAT DOES
THE HEATING OF PLANETS BY STARS, OF STARS BY GALACTIC NUCLEI, OF GALACTIC
NUCLEI BY NUCLEI OF SUPERGALAXIES AFFECT?
The heating of the planets by the Sun - this is the
only factor determining such astronomical characteristics of the planets as their
rotation around their own axis, the slope of the equatorial plane to the
ecliptic plane, the periodic change in the distance between the hemispheres of
the planets and the center of the Sun, as well as the distance between the
center of the planet and the center of the Sun.
The same can be said about the dependence of the same
characteristics of the planets from their heating any other star (besides the
Sun), around which they rotates.
Also, the similar astronomical characteristics of stars
(rotation, tilt, the change of the distance of hemispheres and also the
distance from center to center) are caused by the heating of them by particles
emitted by the Nucleus of Galaxy that generated them. The same characteristics
of Galactic Nuclei are caused by the heating of them by the Nuclei of Supergalaxies
that created them.
All celestial bodies, formed from material ejected out
of the bowels of other celestial bodies, are spherical. This is explained by
the fact that the substance ejected from the bowels of the heavenly bodies, is
in the molten state. The spherical shape of the body allows using the space most
economically during the process of compound of elementary particles and
chemical elements into single whole. A red-hot state of substance tells us that
all (or almost all) of chemical elements in the composition of this substance
have Fields of Repulsion. Namely this allows them to move freely relative to
each other when they take up free places, submitting to action of the
centripetal Field of Attraction of the formed celestial body. This information
relates to large satellites, planets, stars, nuclei of galaxies and nuclei of
Supergalaxies. The Central Celestial Body of the Universe is not formed by
ejection from other celestial body. It was born during the process of
unification of elementary particles in the first period of existence of this
Universe.
The heating of celestial bodies by falling particles is
realized, at first, at the expense of the process of collision of particles
with chemical elements. And secondly, this is due to the accumulation by
chemical elements of a celestial body of elementary particles with Fields of Repulsion.
Moreover, namely the second factor - the accumulation of particles - allows
absorbing elements retain their “received” temperature. At the same time the
degree of transformation increasing during the process of collision quickly
returns to the previous level.
Accumulation of elementary particles by a celestial
body is carried out thanks Fields of Attraction in separately taken elements,
but mainly due to the presence in any celestial body of the Field of
Attraction. In this case, all particles falling on the bombarded celestial body
initially absorbed by the chemical elements of the surface layers of the
celestial body (except those that are rejected). But then, all particles absorbed
by elements “flow” down toward the center of the celestial body.
Under the rays of the “heating” celestial body at any
given moment of time is always the whole hemisphere of the “heated” celestial
body. We are not talking about the northern or southern hemisphere. It’s just a
hemisphere bombarded by particles. So, all elements of surface layers of the “illuminated”
hemisphere “accumulate” particles for the entire celestial body, and especially
for its central part - for the kernel. Thus, as an illuminated celestial body would
not change its position in the space, elements of its central part continue to
accumulate particles with Fields of Repulsion, and to be heated by such way.
The substance of celestial body disposed in its
equatorial plane is heated most of all. And this is due to the fact that namely
the region of equator in the early life of a celestial body was closest to the
center of the heating it (and gave rise to it) celestial body.
1) Arising of the Field of Repulsion
in the region of the planet that faces in the given moment to the sun, due to
accumulation by surface layers of elementary particles emitted by the sun is
the cause of the planet's rotation (and of any “heated” celestial body);
2) The
distance between the center of a celestial body and the center of its parent
heavenly body is entirely due to the total temperature of the substance
located in the equatorial plane of a considered celestial body;
3) The
constant change in position of the axis of rotation of a celestial body about
the real or imaginary axis of rotation of its parent celestial body (such
as the planet's rotation axis relative to the axis of rotation of the Sun) is
due to the periodicity of the heating and cooling of each of two hemispheres.
On the imaginable axis of rotation we should speak in those cases when a
celestial body does not rotate. For example, the Central Sun of the universe does
not rotate;
4) The axis
of rotation of a celestial body is constantly in the process of changing of the
angle of inclination to the ecliptic plane, which is due to the
emergence of a constantly acting Field of Repulsion.
05. REASONS FOR
BEGINNING OF THE ROTATION OF PLANETS
The rotation of planets, which seems so natural, was
not peculiar to the planets immediately after they arose. Special conditions
were required for it started.
Planets are formed from material ejected from stars. The
temperature of stars is low compared to the temperature of Nuclei of Galaxies
and Supergalaxies, especially compared to the Central Sun of the universe, and
this is because of the smaller number of chemical elements in their composition
(which reduces the degree of transformation caused by gravity). Therefore, a
significant amount of material sufficient for the formation of planets is ejected
by stars only in the plane of the equator. Namely in the plane of the equator
of a star there is an accumulation of the most number of particles with Fields
of Repulsion emitted by the Nucleus of Galaxy, gave birth to this star. At the
moment of birth - ejection from the sun - the planet can be with whatever side
of the Sun in relation to the Nucleus of Galaxy. A planet necessarily begins to
rotate some time after its birth. But for the beginning of rotation it is necessary
that the planet does not shield by the sun from the action of gravity of Galaxy
nucleus or is not on the line connecting the Sun with the Galactic Nucleus. In
any other position the planet necessarily starts to rotate. However, planets
after their occurrence begin to revolve around the sun – i.e. move around in a
circle. Therefore, even if at the moment of time the planet was located on a
straight line drawn through the centers of the Sun and the Nucleus of galaxy
(behind or in front of the Sun), due to the orbital motion the planet after a
while will go to the position “laterally”.
All stars emit elementary particles. Therefore after
formation the planets begin to be bombarded and heated by the sun. But only that
hemisphere is heated that faces the sun. At the same time, the other
hemisphere, the opposite of what turned to the sun is not heated and therefore
turns colder. And accordingly, the total Field of Attraction of the night
hemisphere, not facing the sun, is larger compared to the heated hemisphere.
So, at the planets at the moment of their location
"laterally" of the Sun that created them their not heated hemisphere,
located on the night side, is attracted by the Nucleus of Galaxy. The Force of
Attraction, caused by the Nucleus of Galaxy, due to the large distance to it is
less than Forces of Attraction caused by the Sun. But, anyway, this Force of Attraction
exists and exerts its influence on all celestial bodies in the solar system.
Simultaneously with this the heated hemisphere of the planet begins to move
away from the Sun. And here it is the gravitation from the side of the Galactic
Nucleus decides “the fate of the planet”. Or rather, this attraction is a
reason for starting rotation of the planet. I.e. as a result, the planet
revolves around its own axis, as the hemisphere opposite heated, colder, tends
to move in the direction of the Galaxy Nucleus, and the heated hemisphere moves
away from the Sun.
The phrase “laterally” we hope you guessed it, means
that the planet is not shielded by the sun, gave birth to it, from the Nucleus
of Galaxy, and is not on the line connecting the centers of the Nucleus of Galaxy
and the Sun.
06. RETROGRADE AND
PROGRADE ROTATION OF PLANETS
Due to astronomical observations, we know that most of
planets in our solar system revolve in the prograde direction – i.e.
counterclockwise. And this direction of rotation coincides with the direction
of rotation of the Sun. However, two planets in the solar system rotate in the retrograde
direction – i.e. clockwise. Venus and Uranus rotate by such way.
Let's examine why not all planets of the solar system
rotate in the same direction.
As already mentioned, the reason for starting rotation
of each planet is an action of two factors – a tendency of the hemisphere
heated by the star (the sun), to move away from it and an attraction of the
opposite, cooler hemisphere by the Nucleus of galaxy. As already mentioned, the
rotation of the planet began only when the planet was located “laterally” of
the Sun (star) to the Nucleus of the Galaxy. So, prograde or retrograde the rotation
of the planet became, it depended on only one factor. And namely from which “side”
of the Sun the planet was located at the start of the rotation. We can conditionally
defined designate one “side” of the Sun as a right, and other - as a left. For
example, if you look at the Nucleus of Galaxy from the position of an observer
on the Sun, then the “side” of the Sun on the right is the right and one on the
left is the left.
So, if the planet at the start of rotation was on the
right “side” of the Sun, then it began to rotate counter-clockwise – i.e. forward.
Most of the planets in our solar system were in such situation. If the planet was
located on the left “side” of the Sun, then it began to rotate in a clockwise
direction – i.e. in the opposite direction. Venus and Uranus were in this
strategy.
But why the planets did not change their direction of
rotation after they were in the course of rotation around the sun on its other “side”.
And here's why.
The magnitude of the Force of Attraction that arises
in any planet or satellite in the solar system composition in relation to the Nucleus
of Galaxy is always less than the Force of Attraction that arises with respect
to the Sun (i.e. to a star). And the reason for this is the difference in
distances. The Nucleus of the Galaxy is very far. And so, even despite of its
huge size (much larger than of the Sun), the magnitude of the Force of
Attraction arising in relation to it, is less.
When the planet did not yet rotate, one its hemisphere
completely turned to the sun, and another was completely away from it. This
means that the turned away hemisphere did not “feel” attraction of the Sun
(precisely because it turned away from it). There was only attraction of the Nucleus
of the Galaxy. But once the heated hemisphere began to turn away from the Sun,
starting thus the planet's rotation, at the same time the colder, turned away
hemisphere began gradually to come back to the illuminated side. And once that
happens, the Force of Attraction directed toward the Sun begins to act on it, and
it is greater than the Force of Attraction to the Nucleus. As a result, after
the rotation of the planet began, its direction does not change. And all
because of that now, all time, when chilled on the night side area begins to come
back to the illuminated side, the Gravity Field of the area forces this area to
move in the direction of the Sun. And so, there is a rotation of the planet. We
recall that on the illuminated side of a planet a Field of Repulsion is
forming, and that, in fact, makes the heated area to move away from the Sun.
As you understand, we can talk about the prograde and
retrograde rotation not only of planets, but also of stars and Galactic Nuclei.
07. THE SEASONAL
(EXOTERIC) AND ASTRONOMICAL (ESOTERIC) CLASSIFICATION OF MONTHS
The modern world lives according to the Julian
calendar, according to which in the year there are 12 months, of which three
belong to the winter season, 3 - to the summer, 3 – to the autumn, and 3 - to
the spring. And, for the northern hemisphere months relating to any of 4
seasons are specularly opposite to the months characterizing the same seasons
in the southern hemisphere.
But it is well-known facts. And now let us turn to
what science does not know.
Usually people classify months in accordance with the
annually recurring processes of a general lowering of the temperature of the
surface layers of the Earth (autumn, winter), and of a general increase in
temperature (spring, summer). In autumn and winter the earth's surface is
gradually cooled and in spring and summer - is gradually heated. September,
October and November attributed to the autumn months, to winter - December,
January and February. March, April, May belong to spring. To summer - June,
July and August. This is an exoteric systematization. It is known even to
younger students.
With regard to the esoteric classification of the
esoteric, it is known only to occultists, and even then not for everybody.
Anyway, people studying in the Trans-Himalayan Esoteric School are aware of its
existence and use this information in the course of their meditations.
We will tell you more details.
If we classify months in accordance with astronomical
observations, then we should divide them into four groups of three months in
each. Three months would be attributed to the winter solstice, three - for the
summer, three - to the autumnal equinox, and the last three - for the spring.
Moreover, the days of solstices and equinoxes
themselves would represent central “cutoffs” in each of the four groups.
But at the same time there would be the next problem. The
days of solstices and equinoxes are not located in the middle of the month -
all they are in the early 20's numbers. I.e. we should shift the beginning of
all months so that the days of solstices and equinoxes would come about on the
15th numbers of the months.
But humanity keeps a calendar relying not on
astronomical observations and in accordance with the processes of annual change
of heat and cold on the earth's surface.
Why do not coincide with each other the astronomical
(esoteric) and seasonal (exoteric) classification of months?
For the northern hemisphere the winter season can be
correlated with the time of the winter solstice, the summer season - with time
of the summer solstice, autumn - with the period of the autumnal equinox and
the spring - with the period of the vernal equinox. For the southern hemisphere a correlation of the seasons
and moments of solstices and equinoxes will be specularly opposite.
We remind you that the solstice (summer or
winter, it does not matter) - is the time when one of the hemispheres of the
most turned to the Sun (close to it) and other at this time maximum turn away
(far from it). At the same time, the equinox (spring or fall) is the time
when both hemispheres are from the Sun at the same distance
However, for each of the hemispheres, each of the
seasons “lags behind” more than a month against a group of 3 months, belonging
to one or another solstice or equinox. For example, February for the
northern hemisphere - this is the last of the winter months. But from the
astronomical point of view, February is the first month referring to the group
of vernal equinox months. Or, for example, May - for the northern hemisphere is
the last month of spring. But from the astronomical point of view this is the
first month referring to the group of summer solstice months. Similar
information we can lead to August, and November. August in the northern
hemisphere - this is the last month of summer. But with the astronomical
positions - this is the first month belonging to the group of the autumnal
equinox. November is the last month of autumn. And in astronomical terms - this
is the first month of the winter solstice.
What is the cause of this “displacement” of the seasonal
classification regarding astronomical? The whole point is in the features of
the heating and cooling of the surface and intermediate layers of the planet by
solar particles.
In the article “Planets are fried on a spit” we will
discuss in detail the reasons forcing the hemispheres of the planets
periodically change the distance to the center of the Sun. We will talk about
the main points.
As part of any planet we conditionally have allocated a
core, surface layers and layers, intermediate between the core and surface
layers. However, it is really just a convention. No boundaries between the
layers, one layer smoothly passes into another. In
the composition of surface layers and in the composition of intermediate and in
the core there are layers, located near to the center of the planet, and there
are layers located farther from it. Solar photons falling on the planet at
first are accumulated (absorbed) by chemical elements of the overlying surface
layers. And then, under influence of the planet Field of Attraction “gravitate”
into the layers located below. And so they gradually move from one layer to
another, farther to the center. As a result, in the planet's core the concentration
of solar photons is the largest. Only particles with Fields of Repulsion are
able to raise the temperature of the chemical elements absorbing them. The
photons with the Fields of Repulsion predominate in the composition of the
solar radiation reaching any of the planets. That is why an accumulation by planets
of solar particles leads to the total increase in temperature within the
planet. The process of “settling” of photons from more superficial layers into
the underlying takes certain time – i.e. it does not occur instantaneously.
And now we will talk directly on why the seasonal classification
of months is displaced relative to the astronomical classification.
In general it can be said that the weather of each
month depends firstly on the total amount of solar photons received at a given
time by the earth surface, and secondly, it depends on the degree of heating of
the lower, deeper layers of the planet.
The reason for changing the distance between the
hemispheres and the center of the Sun is a change of the total temperature of
the deep surface and also of intermediate layers in each of the hemispheres.
The moment of the winter solstice in the northern hemisphere is time of the highest
total temperature of deep superficial and intermediate layers. This time is the
turning point. Since then, this temperature begins to fall more, which leads to
increase in the total Field of Attraction of the hemisphere as a whole. Because
of this, gradually decreases its distance from the Sun.
From the moment of the summer solstice to the winter temperature of deep superficial and intermediate
layers of the northern hemisphere is growing due to the accumulation of solar
photons (solar energy). And as the temperature increases, the hemisphere gradually
moves away from the Sun. Seclusion of the hemisphere leads to the fact that the
superficial layers receive less and less solar photons. The Earth's surface
cools more and more - do not forget that the underlying layers due to their
gravitation constantly take away photons.
Thus, during the time of the summer solstice to the
winter in the intermediate and superficial layers of the northern hemisphere
opposite processes occur. The Earth's crust is gradually cooled, and
intermediate layers are heated more and more.
Underlying superficial and intermediate layers are
heated for the simple reason that they receive solar photons from the upper
surface layers. It takes time to the “settling” of photons from the surface to
the intermediate. Later the photons of the intermediate layers gravitate to the
center of the planet. Settling of photons leads to the cooling of
layers where from they are moving downwards, and to the heating of layers in
which they are coming down.
It turns out that in the period from the summer
solstice to the winter, due to an approximation of the northern hemisphere to
the sun, chemical elements of the earth's crust in this hemisphere receive more
and more solar photons. In the future, these photons will start their way down,
coming down into the intermediate layers in the period from the summer solstice
to the winter.
This is the essence of explanation why the greatest heating
of the intermediate layers of the northern hemisphere occurs in the period from
the summer solstice to the winter. Please note - on the surface of the planet
at this time is getting colder, and in depth - warmer and hotter.
Do not forget that even when the hemisphere is
increasingly turning away from the Sun, its crust continues to accumulate solar
photons, although in much smaller quantities.
Photons need time to move through the substance of the
planet down to its center. Moreover, the scale of the surface layers of the
earth within which we usually estimate the temperature of Earth's surface substance
and talking about warming or cooling is very small in comparison with the scale
of the entire planet. We can assume that the humanity “does not plunge” into
the planet generally deeper than 1 kilometer.
In the period from the summer solstice to the winter,
when the northern hemisphere is increasingly turning away from the Sun, its
surface layers receive less and less solar photons.
They are deposited down with a delay. I.e. to ensure
that the photons passed from the surface layers to the intermediate, takes
time. The process of "settling" of photons that fall into the surface
layers during the period from summer to winter will continue after the winter
and will pass to the spring. And as from summer to winter the amount of solar
radiation received by the planet gradually decreased, and an amount of
accumulated photons in the crust is little, the intermediate layers in the
process of settling also get them a little, and the temperature decreases. As a
consequence - the northern hemisphere cools. And as it cools, then its Field of
Attraction increases. And it approaches to the Sun. And the most chilling
accounts at the time of the summer solstice – in this time into the
intermediate layers there occurs the settling of photons accumulated by the
crust at the winter solstice, and there were very little of them.
It turns out that the planet is delayed by six months
in its response to the heating of the surface by solar photons.
And now we again will talk about why the seasonal classification
offset relative to the astronomical classification of months.
The moment of the summer solstice corresponds to the
minimum distance from the North Pole to the center of the Sun. At this time,
the surface layers of the Earth's surface of the northern hemisphere receive
the greatest amount of solar particles with Fields of Repulsion (as well as of particles
with Fields of Attraction). After the moment of summer solstice the earth's
surface begins to be heated less and less.
Then why, oddly enough, July is the hottest
month, and August is also hot enough? The thing is that by this time the
deep layers of the surface layers of the planet are already warmed enough. I.e.
these layers have received enough photons accumulated by the most superficial
layers during the period from the winter solstice to summer. Warming of the
deep layers in the composition of the surface layers of the earth is the cause
of reducing the Field of Attraction of the planet. For this reason, during the
night time atmosphere, hydrosphere and solid surface of the crust do not so
much cool, as it happened if deep layers would not be heated. We recall that
the cooling of substances on the earth’s surface is due to "settling"
down of accumulated photons with Fields of Repulsion – i.e. due to their moving
toward the center of the planet.
Thus, because of the not so strong cooling of the
earth's surface at night, July is the hottest month (despite
the fact that it is the last month, referring to the period of the summer
solstice). And August by the same reason does not be attributed to the autumn,
but to the summer season.
At the same time, May refers to the spring season, and
not to the summer, and just because of the fact that by this time the deeper
layers in the composition of the surface layers still not heated enough, so at
night the earth's surface cools to a greater extent than that observed, for
example, in August. While at the same time, May refers to the group of
months of the summer solstice and the earth's surface at this time already
receives enough of solar particles.
Similar information we can lead to other three
seasons.
Аналогичную
информацию можно привести для остальных трех сезонов.
The fall season as it is known consists of three
months - September, October and November. But only two of them - September and
October are really the autumn. In September, the vernal equinox
occurs. And October immediately follows September. The first month of those,
relating to autumnal equinox is August. However, as mentioned, due
to the high temperature of the surface layers of the Earth, it belongs to the
summer season.
As for November, then it is not yet so cold
to attribute this month for the winter season. Although namely November is the
first month of those, that “surround” the winter solstice. November is the
first true winter month. But this is only by the esoteric classification.
In exoteric systematization December opens winter. But
as you know, the winter solstice is in December. On December 22 in the northern
hemisphere there is the longest night and the shortest day. So according to the
esoteric classification, December is the second month of
winter, but not the first.
January is the second month of winter. But in reality it is the last. And February
traditionally closing the winter season, in fact, opens the spring. It belongs
to the vernal equinox. It is the first of three spring months of the esoteric
classification. However, due to the fact that at this time the northern
hemisphere is still quite far away from the Sun, and its surface is still cold
(receives a little of solar photons), February not for nothing is attributed to
winter.
In late March, the vernal equinox occurs. March
is the second month of spring, according to the esoteric classification, but
the first in accordance with the Julian calendar.
April is the
last month, referring to the period of the vernal equinox. But according to
tradition, this is the second month of spring.
And here we are again back to May. It is the last month
of spring, as is commonly believed. But it is the first month of the summer
solstice in accordance with astronomical observations. In May the surface
layers have warmed up not enough that people view it as the summer season.
08. DISTANCES OF
THE PLANETS FROM THE SUN
Mercury - 58 million km;
Venus - 108 million km;
Earth - 150 million km;
Mars - 228 million km;
Jupiter - 778 million km;
Saturn - 1.43 billion km;
Uranium - 2.87 billion km;
Neptune - 4.5 billion miles;
Pluto - 5.95 billion miles.
The distance of planets to the center of the star
(spawned them), as well as their rotation, is related to the formation of the Field
of Repulsion (ethereal shield) in the heated area of the planet. However,
unlike the speed of rotation of the planet, the distance is caused not by to
heating rate and directly by the magnitude of the Field of Repulsion arising in
response to the heating by solar radiation.
The larger this magnitude, i.e. more is the rate of emission
of ether, the farther from the star a planet will be located.
All planets in our solar system have now one or
another angle of inclination of their rotation axis to the ecliptic plane.
Inclination of the axis of rotation is due to the fact that the substance of
the planet warms by solar radiation (accumulates particles with Fields of Repulsion).
Substance in the equatorial plane of the planet warmed up to the greatest
extent. This is explained by the fact that at the beginning of life on the
planet, when it just started to rotate, the axis of rotation is perpendicular
to the line drawn through the center of the Sun and the center of the planet.
So, the inclination of the axis indicates that at the planet in the equatorial
region and adjacent areas there is formed a continuously existing Field of Repulsion.
The Field of Repulsion of a planet is formed by particles with the same Fields
accumulated on the surface of chemical elements of the atmosphere - lingering
in the composition of the surface layers of the planet. Actually, it is because
of this constant Field of Repulsion planet “lean”.
For what it's been said? Yes to the fact that when we
talk about a Field of Repulsion (ethereal shield), the value of which
determines the distance of the planet to the Sun, then we are talking about a Field
of Repulsion that exists in the planet's equator, as it is the largest in
magnitude.
I.e. the magnitude of exactly this Field of Repulsion
arising in the equatorial plane, and just will allow to estimate the distance
between the planet and the sun. The greater the magnitude of this field
Repulsion – i.e. the higher is the rate of emission of ether by the equator of
the plane, the greater the distance between the planet and the Sun.
The planets in the solar system can be likened to
balloons. The air inside the balloon dome is heated by the burner flame and
thus the balloon is moving away from the planet's surface (i.e. from its
center). Only in the case of planets the Sun itself plays the role of the burner.
Let's think about why all planets move away from the
Sun.
First, we should remind ourselves that the farther
away from the Sun, the smaller the number of solar particles reaching this
point.
So, during the heating of the substance of equator
region, the Field of Repulsion of this area is growing. Due to the fact that solar
particles accumulated in the surface layers linger there longer. Increase of
Field of Repulsion says that the rate of emission of ether becomes greater than
the rate at which ether moves to the Sun (i.e. greater than the sun's Gravity
field at a given point). If the planet emits ether faster than it is attracted
by the sun, it begins to move away. However, as already mentioned, with
increasing of the distance from the sun there is a decrease of solar particles
reaching the planet. This means that the rate of distancing of any planet from
the Sun gradually decreases with increase of its distance from the Sun. I.e. the
distancing of planets slows down, as they move away. We can say that there is a
feedback mechanism. The farther from the Sun, the less of solar particles reach
the planet, and due to this the magnitude of the Field of Repulsion formed by
the planet decreases. As a result, there is no fast departure of the planet
from the Sun. No,
all planets move away gradually,
slowly.
09. THE CAUSE OF
ELLIPTICAL SHAPE OF ORBITS OF THE PLANETS
The reason for which the planets move in orbits having
an ellipse shape is very simple. Planets are rejected by attraction of the Galactic
Nucleus. The Nucleus of the Galaxy is a celestial body, much larger than any
star. Namely it gave rise to all stars of our Galaxy, ejecting the substance
from itself.
Aphelion of orbit indicates the direction exactly on
the Galactic Nucleus.
10. “PLANETS ARE
FRIED ON A SKEWER”
Due to astronomical observations, we know that every planet
in the solar system rotates around its own axis. And we know that all planets
have one or another angle of inclination of the rotation axis to the ecliptic
plane. It is also known that during the year each of two hemispheres of any
planet changes its distance from the Sun. But by year-end a position of the
planets relative to the sun is the same as a year ago (or rather to say, almost
the same). There are also such facts that astronomers do not known, but
nevertheless, that exist. For example, there is a constant, but smooth changing
in the angle of inclination of the axis of each planet. The angle increases.
And, in addition, there is a constant and gradual increase in the distance
between the planets and the Sun. Is there a connection between all these
phenomena?
Answer - yes, of course. All these phenomena are due
to existence in the planets as Fields of Attraction and Fields of Repulsion,
due to the characteristics of their location in the composition of the planets,
as well as changes in their value.
We are so accustomed to the knowledge that our Earth
rotates on its axis, as well as to the fact that the northern and southern
hemisphere of the planet for a year then move away, then approach the Sun. And
with the rest of the planets everything is the same. But why planets behave
this way? What motivates them?
Let's start with the fact that any of the planets can
be compared with an apple impaled on a skewer and roasted over a fire. The role
of “fire” in this case performs the sun, and a “skewer” is an axis of rotation
of a planet. Of course, people often roast meat, but here we look at the
experience of vegetarians, because fruits often have a rounded shape, which
makes them similar to the planets. If we fry an apple over a fire, we do not move
it around the source of fire. Instead, we rotate the apple, as well as change
the position of the skewer relative to the fire. The same thing is happening
with the planets. They rotate and change the position of the “skewer” throughout
the year relative to the sun, warming, so their “sides”.
The reason that the planets revolve around their axes,
as well as throughout the year the poles periodically change the distance from
the Sun, is about the same according to which we rotate the apple over the
fire. The analogy with a skewer was not chosen randomly. We always keep the
least deep fried (the least-heated) area of an apple over the fire. Planets
also always tend to turn to the sun by their least heated side, the total
gravity field of which is the greatest compared to other areas. However, the
expression "tend to turn" does not mean that the way it really
happens. The trouble is that any of planets at the same time has just two sides,
the gravity of which to the Sun is greatest. This is the poles of the planet. This
means that from the moment of birth of the planet, both poles simultaneously
sought to take a position to be closest to the Sun.
Yes, when we talk about the attraction of the planet
to the Sun, it should be noted that different areas of the planet are attracted
to it in different ways, i.e. in varying degrees. At least - the equator. To the
greatest extent – the poles. Note - the number of poles is two.
I.e. if two areas tend to be on the same distance from
the center of the Sun. The poles throughout the existence of the planet
continue to balance, constantly competing with each other for the right to
occupy a position closer to the Sun. But even if one pole temporarily wins and
gets closer to the Sun than other, this other, continues to “graze” it, seeking
to turn the planet so as to be closer to the luminary. This struggle between
two poles directly affects the behavior of the whole planet. It’s difficult for
the poles to approach to the Sun. However, there is a factor facilitating their
task. This factor is the existence of the angle of inclination of the rotation
axis to the ecliptic plane.
However, in the beginning of life planets had no
inclination of the axis. The cause of emergence of inclination is the
attraction of one of the poles of the planet by one of the poles of the Sun.
Let’s consider how inclination of the axes of rotation
of a planet appears.
When the substance from which the planets formed is
ejected from the Sun, an ejection does not necessarily occur in the equatorial
plane of the Sun. Even a small deviation from the equatorial plane of the sun
results in that the formed planet is located to one of the poles of the sun
closer than to another. And to be more precise, it is only one of the poles of
the formed planet is closer to one of the poles of the Sun. For this reason, namely
this pole of the planet experiences greater attraction from the pole of the
Sun, to whom it was closer.
As a result, one of the hemispheres immediately turned
toward the Sun. So an initial inclination of axis of rotation appeared at the planet. That
hemisphere, which was closer to the Sun, respectively, immediately began to
receive more solar radiation. And because of this the hemisphere from the
outset was heated to a greater extent. Greater heating of one hemisphere of the
planet becomes the reason that the total gravity field of this hemisphere
decreases. I.e. during the heating of the hemisphere approached the Sun began
to decrease its tendency to move closer to the pole of the Sun, attraction of which
made the planet to be closer. And the more this hemisphere warms, the more
leveled the gravitation of both poles of the planet, of each to “its closest”
pole of the Sun. As a result, the heated hemisphere turns away from the sun
more and more, and the more chilled begins to approach. But note, as this
change of poles happened (happens). Very peculiar.
After the planet was formed from material ejected by
the Sun, and now revolves around, it immediately begins to be heated by solar
radiation. This heating makes it rotate around its own axis. Initially an axial
tilt was not. Because of this, the equatorial plane is warming to the greatest
extent. Because of this, namely in the equatorial region not disappeared Field
of Repulsion appears in the first turn and its magnitude is greatest from the
outset. In areas adjacent to the equator with time not relieved Field of
Repulsion also appears. A value of the squares of the areas, on which there is
a Field of Repulsion, is demonstrated by an angle of inclination of axis.
But the sun also has a constantly existing Field of
Repulsion. And, like the planets, in the area of the Sun's equator the value of
its Field of Repulsion is greatest. And since all planets at the moment of ejection
and formation were located in the Sun's equator, they revolved thus in the zone
where the Field of Repulsion of the Sun is greatest. Precisely because of this,
because of collision of the biggest in magnitude Fields of Repulsion of the
planet and the Sun, the changing of the position of the hemispheres of the
planet can’t occur by vertical. I.e. the lower hemisphere can’t just “go” back
and up and the upper - down and forward.
The planet in the process of changing
hemispheres implements a “workaround”. It rotates so that its own equatorial Field
of Repulsion at least extent collides with the equatorial Field of Repulsion of
the Sun. I.e. the plane in which the Field of Repulsion of the planet is
located at an angle to the plane in which there is the equatorial Field of
Repulsion of the Sun. This allows to the planet to save available distance to
the Sun. Otherwise, if there was the coincidence of the planes in which the Fields of Repulsion of the planet and of the
Sun manifest, the planet would have been severely set from the Sun.
That's the way the planets change the position of
their hemispheres relative to the sun - sideways, sideways ...
The time from the summer solstice to the winter for
any of the hemispheres is a period of gradual heating of this hemisphere.
Accordingly, the time from the winter solstice to summer is a period of gradual
cooling. The moment of summer solstice corresponds to the lowest total temperature
of the chemical elements in this hemisphere. The moment of winter solstice
corresponds to the highest total temperature of the composition of chemical
elements in the composition of this hemisphere. I.e. in the moments of the summer and
winter solstices that hemisphere is drawn to the Sun that chilled at this moment
most of all. Amazing, is not it? After all, as our everyday experience says
us that everything should be the opposite - in summer it’s hot and in winter
it’s cold. But in this case we are talking not about the temperature of the
surface layers of the planet, and about the temperature of the entire thickness
of the substance.
But the moments of vernal and autumnal equinoxes
even as correspond to the time when the total temperature of both hemispheres is
equal. That is why at this time both hemispheres are at the same distance from
the Sun.
And finally we say a few words about the role of
heating of planets by solar radiation. Let's do a little thought experiment during
which we look at what would have happened if the stars do not emit elementary
particles and not heated thereby surrounding them planets. If the Sun did not
heat the planets, they would always be turned to the Sun by one side, like the
Moon, the Earth satellite always facing the Earth by the same side. Absence of heating
firstly would deprive the planets of necessary to rotate around its own axis.
Secondly, if there was no heating, there would not be a consistent rotation of
the planets to the Sun then one then other hemisphere during the year. Thirdly,
if there was no heating of the planets by the Sun, the axis of rotation of the
planets would not be bent to the ecliptic plane. Although at the same time all
planet would have continued to revolve around the sun (a star). And fourth, the
planet would not have increased gradually the distance to the sun.
11. THE REASON
OF PRECESSION OF THE EQUINOXES
The precession of the equinoxes - in other words is
the antecedence of the equinoxes.
The precession of the equinoxes (Latin Praecessio aequinoctiorum) – is the historical
name for the gradual displacement of points of the vernal and autumnal
equinoxes (i.e. the points of intersection of the celestial equator and the
ecliptic) towards the annual motion of the Sun. In other words, every year the
vernal equinox comes a little earlier than in the previous year.
Both equinoxes are preceded - and the spring and
autumn. And this anticipation should be explained by the fact that the planet
is gradually heated.
Generally, once we should remember that moment of equinox
(any) corresponds to the time when the total temperature of the substance of
both hemispheres is equal in magnitude. That is why in the equinoxes both
hemispheres are at the same distance from the Sun.
The largest amount of solar radiation is accumulated
by the planet's core. This is explained by the existence at any celestial body
the centripetal Field of Attraction, because of the action of which elementary
particles accumulated on the surface of the chemical elements of the surface
layers of the planet flow down, moving towards the center of the planet. Namely
because of this flowing of particles down, there occurs a cooling of the
surface layers of the planet and a heating of the core. The more heated the
planet's core, the less the value of its Field of Attraction. The less is the
Field of Attraction, the slower the layers of the planet cool – i.e. the slower
particles flow downwards. It turns out that the more the planet's core is
heated, the faster there occurs the warming of a hemisphere. Substance of each
hemisphere is external (surface) with respect to the central part of the
planet.
An amount of substance in the composition in both
hemispheres is the same. And the heating of the core of the planet occurs
incrementally – i.e. in every next moment temperature of the substance becomes
more and more. That's why when there is a change of the position of poles, and
another hemisphere comes to replace a warmed hemisphere, starting to warm up,
it warms up a little bit faster. I.e. a little earlier than it was last year,
the temperature of this hemisphere compared with the temperature of the second
hemisphere. And this just marks the moment of the equinox. Because of this the days
of equinoxes occur all the time a little earlier than before.
12. THE MECHANISM
OF COOLING OF THE SURFACE LAYERS OF A PLANET
Once the particles fall on the planet and accumulate
on the surface of elements in the surface layers either immediately or after
some time they begin their way towards the center of the planet. So there
occurs a process of cooling the planet's surface (atmosphere, hydrosphere,
crust). Particles move down along the line connecting the approximate point of falling
to the planet and the center of the planet. The more solar particles with
Fields of Repulsion will be accumulated along this line, the greater the
substance will be heated, the less solar particles falling on the planet and
accumulated in the surface layers will flow down in the process of cooling.
Naturally to the center of any planet the temperature
of its substance grows precisely because any spherical celestial body has a
centripetal Field of Attraction, which also makes the particles falling on the planet
to strive towards the center of the planet.
13. A GRADUAL
INCREASE IN THE ANGLE OF INCLINATION OF THE AXIS OF ROTATION OF PLANETS
In the early life of the planets they had no inclination
of the axis. The cause of the inclination is an attraction of one of the poles
of the planet by one of the poles of the Sun.
Let’s consider as the inclination of axes of the
planets appears.
When the substance from which the planets are formed
is ejected from the Sun it does not necessarily an ejection occurs in the
equatorial plane of the Sun. Even a small deviation from the equatorial plane
of the Sun results in that the formed planet to one of the poles of the sun is located
closer than to another. And to be more precise, it is only one of the poles of
the formed planet is closer to one of the poles of the Sun. For this reason, namely
this pole of the planet “feels” a greater gravitation from that pole of the
Sun, to whom it is closer.
As a result one of the hemispheres immediately turned
toward the Sun. So an initial inclination of an axis of rotation of a planet appeared.
That hemisphere, which was closer to the Sun, respectively, immediately began
to receive more solar radiation. And because of this the given hemisphere from
the outset began to be warmed to a greater extent. A greater heating of one of
the hemispheres of the planet becomes the reason that the total Gravity Field
of this hemisphere decreases. I.e. during the warm-up of the approached to the
Sun hemisphere there was a decrease of its tendency to move closer to the pole
of the Sun, which gravitation made the planet to be inclined. And the more
this hemisphere is heated, the more leveled the gravitation of both poles of
the planet, each to “its closest” pole of the Sun. As a result, the heated hemisphere
more and more turned away from the sun, and the more chilled began to approach.
But note how this change of poles was happened (and happens). Very peculiar.
With the passage of time the angle of inclination of
the axis of rotation of planets gradually increased. Let’s find out why this is happening.
Generally, when we solve the problem of gravitation (attraction)
of any planet to the sun, we should always remember that just two areas of the
planet - its magnetic poles - tend to be closer to the Sun. This is explained
by the fact that it is the poles are the least heated regions of the planets.
Whenever a planet is rotated to the Sun by one of its hemispheres, at the same
time gravitation to the Sun of the second hemisphere continues to control this
hemisphere. Only this “control” does not allow the planets from the beginning
to turn to the Sun by their poles.
Then why, over time, does an angle of inclination of the
axis of any planet increase more and more? Yes, because over time there has
been increasing the square of the surface of the planet, where there is formed
a not disappeared Field of Repulsion. (We recall that the Field of Repulsion of
the planet does not exist near the surface of the planet. It manifests outwards
in the upper levels of the atmosphere.) A
Field of Repulsion creates a Force of Repulsion. A Field of Repulsion of the
planet collides with the Field of Repulsion of the Sun. And because of this those
areas of the planet, where it has not disappearing Field of Repulsion, tend to
move away from the Sun. And so there occurs an inclination. And the farther
away from the equator and closer to the poles this area occupied by the not
disappearing Field of Repulsion moves, the greater is the angle of inclination
of the axis.
We will say a few words about a non-vanishing Field of
Repulsion of the planets.
Substance in the equatorial plane of the planet is warmed
up to the greatest extent. This is explained by the fact that at the beginning
of life on the planet, when it just started to rotate, the axis of rotation is
perpendicular to the line drawn through the center of the Sun and the center of
the planet. Because of this the equatorial region of any planet from the outset
is closest to the center of the Sun. So, the inclination of the axis indicates
that at the planet in the equatorial region and adjacent areas a continuously
existing Field of Repulsion is formed. The Field of Repulsion of the planet is formed
by particles with Fields of Repulsion accumulated on the surface of the
chemical elements of the atmosphere - staying in the composition of the surface
layers of the planet. As already mentioned, the planets have an “incline”
namely because of arising of this constant Field of Repulsion. Nearest to the
center of the sun is always an area of the planet, which is just in the state
of the heating. This area accumulates the solar particles, and as a result here
there arises a Field of Repulsion, which makes this area to turn away from the Sun.
Why we are talking about this? Yes, because the parallel
of latitude, on which there is an area of the planet closest to the center of
the Sun, and just serves as a border between parallels where there is a
constant Field of Repulsion (equator and adjacent parallels) and the regions
where the Field of Repulsion does not even arise (a pole and polar regions).
On this boundary parallel of latitude a Field of Repulsion appears only after
heating by solar radiation. And after some time, due to the rotation of the
planet, a cooling this area leads to the disappearance of this repulsion field.
14. THE EARTH'S
GRAVITY DECREASES WITH TIME
All planets including Earth accumulate elementary
particles emitted by the Sun. Most of these particles are concentrated in the
central part of any planet. The heating of the substance is caused by the
accumulation of particles with Fields of Repulsion. Such particles predominate
in the composition of the solar radiation. Accumulated particles with Fields of
Repulsion reduce the magnitude of the Fields of Attraction of chemical elements
on the surface where they accumulate. So, in general, they reduce the magnitude
of the Field of Attraction entire planet. From this follows a simple conclusion
– a gravity of any planet including Earth with time is reduced more and more. I.e.
weight (Force of Attraction) of any body on our planet with every moment is
less and less. However, these changes are so small that they are difficult to
measure. Perhaps a comparison of weight of the same body, taken at the
beginning and at the end of the century will give visible results.
15. THE SPEED OF
ROTATION OF PLANETS - WHAT IS THE REASON
All planets revolve around their own axes. However,
each of the planets rotates at its own velocity. Here are the values:
1. Mercury - one revolution around its axis in about
58 Earth days;
2. Venus - turnover for 243 days;
3. Earth - turnover for 24 hours;
4. Mars - turnover in 24 hours 37 minutes;
5. Jupiter - turnover for 9 hours and 55 minutes;
6. Saturn - turnover in 10 hours 40 minutes;
7. Uranium - turnover in 17 hours 14 minutes;
8. Neptune - turnover in 16 hours 03 minutes;
9. Pluto - turnover of 6.38 days.
The speed of rotation of planets is entirely caused only
by one thing – by the speed of the heating of their surface layers.
As mentioned earlier, the mechanism of rotation of
planets is explained by the occurrence of the Field of Repulsion in the area of
a planet, turned at this moment to the Sun. The emerging Field of Repulsion of
a planet is resisted by the Field of Repulsion of the Sun and makes this area
to move away from the Sun. At the same time the cooler regions of the same
hemisphere tends to the Sun. Both of these factors, taken together, make the
planet to rotate around its axis.
In each of two hemispheres of the planet there is a parallel
of latitude, which is the boundary between the equatorial regions (and near
equator), where there exists in the atmosphere a not already vanishing Field of
Repulsion, and the Polar Regions, where there is no such field, and there is
only a Field of Attraction. Namely on this boundary parallel a Field of
Repulsion arises only in the region, which is currently rotated to the Sun.
When this area is facing away from the sun, a Field of Repulsion gradually
decreases and then disappears, in order to appear again when this area again will
turn to the sun.
So, it is the speed of emergence of a non-permanent Field
of Repulsion on the boundary parallel determines the speed of rotation of the
planet.
And now let's find out on what factors the rate of arising
of the Field of Repulsion on the boundary parallel depends. These factors determine
the value of the speed of rotation of the planet.
The first factor affecting the speed of rotation of planets is the distance from a
planet to the Sun. The distance is not important in itself. The value of the
distance to the Sun informs us about the amount of solar particles with Fields
of Repulsion reaching a planet. The shorter the distance to the Sun is, than
the more solar particles with Fields of Repulsion reach a planet, the more heated
the surface layers are and the faster the planet rotates. Conversely, the
greater the distance is, than the less number of particles reaches the planet
and the slower heating of the surface layers is.
The second factor is the degree of heating of the substance of both boundary parallels separating
the regions where there is not disappearing Field of Repulsion from the areas
where such Field yet does not exist. Any planet has two such boundary parallels
of latitude. The substance, whose degree of heating we are interested, this is a
whole thickness of substance that is located under this parallel, up to the
center of a planet. Degree of heating of substances means the amount of solar
particles with Fields of Repulsion accumulated by chemical elements of the
substance. I.e. the more solar particles with Fields of Repulsion are
accumulated by the substance of a planet in the area of these parallels, than
the faster a not constant Field of Repulsion arises at a planet, and the faster
a planet rotates. The greater extent of heating of the bowels of the planet,
the less its Field of Attraction is. This means that elementary particles from
the Sun reached the planet and accumulated by chemical elements of the surface
layers (of the atmosphere) will move down more slowly towards the center of the
planet. Therefore, a necessary Field of Repulsion will be formed by these
particles faster.
The third factor is the atmospheric composition of planets and its thickness (if it is presented
at a planet). The more sparse (the less dense) gases form the planet's
atmosphere, the easier this atmosphere can start to produce a Field of
Repulsion – i.e. can begin to emit Ether. The explanation is that the smaller
the gas density is, the faster these elements form a Field of Repulsion during the
accumulation of particles with Fields of Repulsion by chemical elements of gas.
In the language of modern physics, the less dense gas is easier to heat. But
denser gases are more difficult to heat. This means that for the occurrence of Field
of Repulsion at elements forming these gases they must accumulate (absorb) more
particles with Field of Repulsion.
As it is known, the most low density gases are included
in the atmospheres of the giant planets. Such gases as helium and hydrogen are
very easy to heat, and they quickly begin to emit ether – i.e. a Field of
Repulsion arises at them very quickly.
Now, if we summarize these three factors and analyze
their impact in relation to specific planets of the solar system, we will get
something like this.
As you know, the giant planets rotate most rapidly:
Jupiter – a turnover for 9 hours and 55 minutes, Saturn - 10 hours 40 minutes,
Uranus - 17 hours 14 minutes, Neptune - 16 hours 03 minutes. As you can see
Jupiter and Saturn are the fastest. But the distance factor is not on their
side. Four planets are closer to the Sun than Jupiter, and five planets are
closer than Saturn. Distance from the Sun of other giant planets is more.
Nevertheless, even the most remote giant planet - Neptune - rotates faster than
any of the terrestrial planets. What's the matter? The reason is a combined
influence of two other factors - the degree of heating of the planet and measure
of sparseness of its atmosphere.
The farther from the sun there is a planet, the more
heated substance is in the area of its boundary parallels. And the giant
planets, which are located from the Sun farther than terrestrial planets, are formed
from the solar substance earlier and therefore longer feel the effects of solar
rays.
And, of course, the atmosphere of the giant planets
has a larger percentage of such rarefied gases as helium and hydrogen, and this
also contributes to a higher speed of their heating and hence a higher speed of
rotation.
Regarding the speed of rotation of such planets of the
terrestrial group like Earth and Mars, it is less than that of the giant
planets, but much more than that of Mercury and Venus. The Earth revolves
around its axis in 24 hours, Mars – in 24 hours 37 minutes. Earth and Mars
rotate fast enough due to the greater heating of the substance than that of
Mercury and Venus, and also thanks to a sufficiently high degree of sparsity of
their atmospheres
The speed of rotation of Mercury is so small - one
revolution in 58 Earth days - due to the fact that the substance of Mercury is
heated very slightly (less than all other planets), and because Mercury has
virtually no atmosphere.
Now about Venus. Its rotational speed is 1 turnover
for 243 days. So, the speed of rotation of Venus would have been much more, if
it rotated forward and not backwards. This means that at forward rotation Venus
would rotate much faster than Mercury. Besides Venus is heated stronger than
Mercury and also has a pronounced atmosphere (though dense), while Mercury's
atmosphere, we can say no.
Here it should be said about the fact that the speed
of rotation of Uranus would be much more if it also rotated in the forward
direction, and not the reverse. At the same time Uranus rotates more slowly
than the more distant Neptune.
So, slow rotation of Venus and Uranus should explain
so.
And now, actually, about why Venus and Uranus rotate
more slowly than they would can if their rotation would be direct and not
reverse.
For this, we should remember that in the mechanism of
rotation of planets once two factors play an equally important role. First, it is
an emergence in the heated region of the planets a Field of Repulsion that
makes this area to move away from the sun. And secondly, the tendency of areas
of the planet chilled out on the night side to move closer to the Sun.
The Sun's gravity field is an ethereal stream, moving
counterclockwise in the direction of the poles and the polar regions of the sun
(yes, the Sun also has poles). So, that hemisphere of the planet, it is the
side that is in this ethereal stream closer to its source (i.e. to the Sun absorbing
the ether) will experience greater attraction from the sun's magnetic poles, as
the force of attraction as it is known decreases with distance. The hemisphere of
the planets with direct rotation the eastern hemisphere (moving from the
night side to the day) is the closest to the source of the sun's gravity field.
While at the planets with the reverse rotation – it is the western hemisphere
(moving from the day side to the night).
Accordingly, the second hemisphere of the planet,
which is more remote from the source of the sun's gravity fields, feels far
less attraction to the Sun, as the force of attraction decreases with the
distance. For planets with direct rotation the more remote hemisphere is western.
But for planets with reverse rotation this is the eastern hemisphere.
It is the eastern hemisphere of the planet has a Field
of Attraction. And its greatest value in comparison with other areas of the
planet, since it is this area was on the night side, and most of all cool. It
is the eastern hemisphere through its greatest aspirations to the Sun makes the
planet rotated.
In its turn the western hemisphere is characterized by
the Field of Repulsion gradually turning into the Field of Attraction (due to
the gradual cooling). The western hemisphere also seeks to approach to the Sun,
but to a much lesser extent.
And here please note your attention. The planets with
direct rotation on the western hemisphere have the area (where the Field of Repulsion
disappears and instead it the Field of Attraction appears) is turned away from
the Sun to such extent and is separated from the source of its Field of
Attraction that for this area the shortest path to the source of the sun's
gravity fields is a movement counterclockwise (i.e. continuation of existing movement).
The planet does not seek to turn back clockwise.
But the western hemisphere of the planets with reverse
rotation is the closest to the source of the sun's gravity field. Consequently
the region of the western hemisphere (where the Field of Repulsion due to the
cooling of the planet disappears and is replaced by the Field of Attraction) feels
a significant Force of Attraction to the Sun. It turns out that the eastern hemisphere
of the planets with reverse rotation is located from the source of the sun's
gravity field further, which reduces its aspiration to the Sun. And, moreover,
and the western hemisphere seeks to the Sun. As a result, this aspiration to
the Sun of the western hemisphere slows down the rotation of the planet, because
it prevents the aspiration to the Sun from the side of the eastern hemisphere.
16. THE CAUSES
OF DISCREPANCIES CONTINENTS AND SEPARATION OF PANGAEA
“Around 1960, an American geologist Harry
Hess Hemond suggested that molten rocks of the mantle rose from some cracks,
in particular extending along the middle of the Atlantic Ocean. Near the top of
these rocks spread to the sides, then cooled off and solidified. The bottom of
the ocean thus was expanding and stretching. According to this theory the
continents do not drift, and they are just displaced by the rocks of expanding
oceans” (Isaac Asimov “Guide to Science”).
Substance of the planet is expanding. First, it’s
because of reduction of mass of the nuclei of elements in the process of
radioactive decay. Secondly, due to reduction of mass of elements due to accumulation
by the Earth of solar free particles. The surface of the planet - crust – is formed
by elements with light nuclei and they came out on the planet's surface during
volcanic activity. And these elements with light nuclei in the bowels of the
planet during the radioactive decay (decay reason - quality transformation of
particles due to the action of forces of attraction). Elements of crust because
of the small Force of Attraction of nuclei in the radioactive decay are not
involved. Volume of the planet increases due to the growing of the planet’s Force
of Repulsion and to reduce of the Force of Attraction of elements. The temperature
of the elements in the planet's interior is higher than temperature of the
elements on the surface. A crust - is dense chemical compounds having a low
temperature. Continents - are the primary earth's crust. As a result of
increasing the volume of the material interior of the planet, the crust cracks
and diverges as the crust on rising yeast dough. This is confirmed by
continental drift – in reality they diverge, and not drift. All new layers of substance
are postponed under the primary cortex during volcanic activity.
At the bottom of continents the old layers of the
cortex are the thinnest, so in these places there are constant zones of
volcanic activity.
The cracking crust we know as earthquakes, volcanic
activity, and fractures in the crust. And a discrepancy between the individual
huge zones of the crust is known as “continental drift”. Chemical elements with
lighter nuclei arising in the bowels during radioactive decay come out on the
surface of celestial bodies during cracking of the crust. Or more precisely,
they break the bonds between the elements of the cortex.
The continents do not drift in reality. They drift
apart from each other as a result of expansion of the earth globe (such as how
the balloon expands during its inflating). The bottom of the oceans is
constantly “being created” due to constant output of magma from the depths of
the earth. The earth's crust in this diverges like dried crust on rising yeast dough.
17. DEPENDENCE OF
INTENSITY OF SOLAR RADIATION FROM SOLAR LATITUDE
The equatorial plane of the Sun is an area of maximum
intensity of solar radiation. This is due to the fact that the solar equator is
best "warmed up" by the "energy" of the nucleus of the
galaxy. Accordingly, the polar regions of the Sun (and of other stars) warmed
up by the "energy" of the galactic nucleus worst.
The Sun (i.e. the central celestial body in our solar
system) to the nucleus of the galaxy is the same than the planets are in
relation to the star. And the stars are also receivers of radiation of "energy"
of the galactic nucleus like planets are the receivers of the radiation from
stars.
The nucleus of the galaxy - is the central celestial
body of our Galaxy. The Nucleus of Galaxy also has an area of equator, which
coincides with the plane of the orbits of stars around the Galactic Nucleus.
Concentration of solar radiation in the solar equator is
maximal. This is due to the fact that the "energy" of the Galactic Nucleus,
reflected by the sun joins to the radioactive "energy" of the Sun.
And at the equator a maximal amount of energy is reflected because this region
is most "warmed up".
The same can be said about the concentration of
radiation of Galactic Nuclei, Nuclei of Supergalaxy and the Central Celestial
Body of the Universe. And also about planets, as they also emit own radioactive
"energy" and reflect the energy of stars.
The orbits of stars around the Nucleus of the Galaxy
are located approximately in one plane as the planets' orbits are located in
one plane.
The crust is formed by: first, non-radioactive
elements with the heaviest nuclei of those that erupt on the surface of
planets, and secondly, the compounds of these elements with the elements with
lighter nuclei. Over the crust there is a shell consisting of elements with the
lightest nuclei - the lithosphere and the hydrosphere.
The cause of periodic heating and cooling of each
element on the surface of the planet is the rotation of the planet around the star
and around its own axis. Physical state of chemical elements on the planet's
surface varies periodically. During heating by the rays of a star it becomes sparser.
During sunset of a star beyond the horizon - it becomes denser. Physical state
of the atmosphere changes more noticeable because of their closer location in
relation to the star.
In addition, the entire surface of the planet can be
divided into "climate zones". A climate depends on the total length
of stay "in the rays of the star" and the average distance of a point
on the surface of the planet from the star.
The greater is the angle at which the sun's rays
"fall" at any point on the planet's surface, the more "warmed"
are the elements at this point and the more rarified is their state of aggregation.
Therefore, the closer to the equator, the thinner is the state of aggregation
of elements and their compounds. Naturally, in the daytime the aggregate state is
sparser, and at night is denser.
And vice versa. The smaller is the angle at which the
sun's rays illuminate some point on the surface of the planet, the weaker this
area is “warmed up” and the denser the state of aggregation of elements.
Therefore, the closer to the poles, the denser is the state of aggregation of elements.
18. THE REASON
FOR EXISTENCE OF RINGS AT THE GIANT PLANETS
At the equator of any planet of the solar system the Force
of Attraction (gravity) is less compared with other areas, such as poles. This
is due to a stronger "warming up" of the equator. As a result, individual
molecules and chemical elements of the atmosphere are not so hard attracted by
solid phase of the planet in the equatorial region. The value of atmospheric
pressure is reduced closer to the equator. Layer of the atmosphere above the
equator is thicker. But also it is thinner as compared with the poles.
Chemical elements and molecules of the atmosphere,
located in the uppermost layers of the atmosphere are distanced on such large
distance from the center of the planet that they cease to reach the necessary amount
of thermal radiation from the planet. And at the same time the giant planets
are very distant from the Sun and therefore the atmosphere gets very little
sunlight. As a result, the aggregate state of the atmospheric gases becomes solid,
and they turn into ice particles of various sizes, which form rings.
In general, the very reason for the existence of such
phenomena as the "ring" is a difference in mass of chemical elements
forming compounds of the atmosphere. The heavier chemical elements that make up
the gas molecules, the closer to the surface of the solid phase of the planet such
icy chip will be located in the rings. The easier chemical elements - the
further away from the planet it is, in the outer regions of the rings.
19. THE FINAL
GOAL OF THE EVOLUTION OF LIFE ON THE EARTH
In the bowels of massive and simultaneously large
celestial bodies in the process of radioactive decay there occurs a birth of
chemical elements with lighter nuclei. During this process the Force of Attraction
of the chemical elements is reduced, and the Force of Repulsion grows. The
distance between the chemical elements increases. This means that the substance
in the depths of heavenly bodies is expanding. Light chemical elements are
pulled out during volcanic activity from the depths on the surface of a
celestial body. The lightest chemical elements such as hydrogen and helium
because of the small Force of Attraction and large Force of Repulsion move away
from the planet's surface so far that they are not held even in the gas shell
of the planet - the atmosphere. We can say they “fly into space”. Other heavier
chemical elements remain on the surface of the celestial body. The more massive
is a celestial body, the more “energy” is released in its depths.
"Energy" liberated during radioactive decay moves between the
chemical elements on the surface of a celestial body. During the moving between
elements the "energy" integrates into the "voids" of
chemical elements themselves, heating them and thereby preventing the formation
of chemical compounds or destroying of existing ones.
The purpose of the evolution of life on Earth is to
create beings who could become carriers of chemical elements the composition of
which would be attended by elementary particles of all Plans. Esoteric name for
the chemical element is "Soul" and "The Fifth Element".
Soul is born from the "marriage of Matter and Spirit". So it happens
in reality. "Matter" is heavy elementary particles. "The
Spirit" is light elementary particles. Those and others are present in the
composition of chemical elements. In chemical elements of any kingdom -
mineral, vegetable, animal or human - "Matter" is elementary
particles of the lower, most dense layers of the Physical Plan.
"Spirit" for the chemical elements of each kingdom is its own. For
chemical elements of the mineral kingdom "Spirit" is elementary
particles of the higher, ethereal layers of the Physical Plan. For chemical
elements of the vegetable kingdom "Spirit" is particles of the Astral
Plan. For the Animal Kingdom – particles of the Mental Plan. For Human Kingdom –
particles of Buddhic Plan. Chemical elements containing astral particles are
included only in the DNA of each cell. Mental and buddhic particles are the part
only of the DNA molecules of neurons of different departments of the nervous
system of animals and humans. Chemical elements of all other molecules (not
DNA) in the composition of bodies of plants, animals and people refer to the
mineral kingdom. The bodies of creatures of the Fifth, superhuman kingdom will
develop on the basis of human bodies. But the heart of the bodies of
superhumans will also be chemical elements of the mineral kingdom.
20. A COMMENTARY
TO THE COSMOLOGICAL HYPOTHESIS
The basis of modern cosmological concepts is the notion
that hydrogen and helium - the lightest of the known chemical elements – are served
as "building blocks" from which during the process of thermonuclear fusion
all heavier chemical elements were created. It is also believed that the source
of "energy" emitted by the sun is still the same thermonuclear fusion.
However, this theory of emergence of heavy elements
from lighter has a significant disadvantage.
Hydrogen and helium are very light due to the fact
that their Force of Attraction is small and Force of Repulsion is large enough.
If the Force of Attraction is small, there is no reason that could
"make" chemical elements to merge with each other, forming thus the elements
with a large number of heavy elementary particles in nuclei - that is, the heavy
elements.
But the process of arising of light chemical elements
(with less massive nuclei) from heavier (with more massive nuclei) is quite
likely.
Once again we focus on the important point. The mass
of a chemical element can change both due to changes in the mass of the
nucleus, and by changing the quantity and quality of the "energy" in
the "voids" of element.
21. THE REASON
OF ABSENCE OF THE ATMOSPHERE ON THE MOON
Our moon like the rest of the bodies in our solar
system is an ejection of solar material. It was "captured" by the
Earth and began to rotate around it. And it was formed around the same time as
Earth. Therefore, it consists initially the same percentage of heavy elements,
as in the composition of the earth – that is larger than in Venus and Mercury,
but less than in the giant planets. Due to the larger number of chemical
elements constituting the earth, the absolute number of heavy elements in its
composition initially was more than that in the composition of the moon.
Therefore, the processes of radioactive decay in the Earth proceed more
intensively than in the bowels of the Moon. As a result, during the radioactive
decay the Moon produces less light elements than Earth. This, and the fact that
the number of elements of the Moon is less than the number of elements of the
Earth and, consequently, the total gravity field is weaker causes that this
small amount of gases that formed in the bowels of the moon is not held by the
gravitational field.
But on many satellites of Jupiter, for example, on Io,
the atmosphere exists. This is explained by the fact that the solar substance
from which these satellites formed was rich in heavy elements (like substance of
the giant planets themselves).
22. WHAT IS A COMET?
Belts of comets, which apparently exist beyond the orbit of Pluto, are the
same as the rings of the giant planets - frozen atmosphere of the Sun. The ice
blocks of different sizes.
As meteorites can knock out of rings the individual chunks
of ice, and larger celestial bodies (asteroids) can knock out the ice blocks
from the belts of comets. A block can be knocked out at the collision in the
direction of the Sun. The sun begins to attract it. So there arises a comet.
23. FORMATION OF
PLANETS IN THE SOLAR SYSTEM
There are many hypotheses of origin and formation of
planets of the solar system. Let’s take a close look on one of them, as it is
the closest to reality. It was proposed by the Soviet scientist, Academician
Vasily Fesenko. He suggested that the planets may have “solar origin”.
Everything is correctly. Planets are formed from
material ejected by the star during its heating by radioactive decay of heavy
chemical elements in its composition.
Giant planets differ from the terrestrial planets only
by their huge thick atmosphere. Under the atmosphere there must exist as solids
planets, like the terrestrial planets.
Terrestrial planets are the product of Sun’s ejection
in a cooled down state as compared with the earlier and hotter state when there
was an ejection of substance “for” giant planets. The earlier Sun contained a
greater number of heavy elements. Consequently, the substance from which the
giant planets formed contained more of heavy elements. Therefore, radioactive
decay processes in the bowels of giant planets were more intense. As a result,
they have accumulated more “energy”" – i.e. have warmed stronger.
Therefore, their chemical elements are in a sparse state of aggregation.
Terrestrial planets formed from material ejected by
the Sun in the later periods of its existence. By then the Sun had already lost
much of its heavy chemical elements - the source of “energy” - radioactively
decayed to lighter elements. Therefore, the substance of the terrestrial
planets was less rich in heavy elements compared with the material “for” giant
planets. Hence - the lower intensity of the radioactive decay processes in
terrestrial planets and less amount of accumulated “energy”. And therefore
there is a more dense aggregate state.
All planets are heated and cooled simultaneously.
They are heated due to emission of “energy” in the
process of radioactive decay of heavy elements. And due to getting of the “energy”
emitted by a star into the cosmic space.
Planets are cooled for the same reason that all other
celestial objects - due to radiation of “energy” into space.
Radius of all planets increases toward the equator and
decreases to the poles. And the gravitational field decreases to the equator
and increases to the poles. The reason is the additional heating of chemical
elements caused by the “energy” obtained from the Sun. Solar “energy” integrates
into the “voids” in elements, leading to additional shielding of nuclei of
elements and reducing their mass. Reducing the mass of the body - is increasing
its Force of Attraction and decrease of the Force of Repulsion. That's why closer
to the equator the planet more “swells” and its gravitational field (Power of
Attraction) is less.
Not only the planets, but also all other celestial
bodies are heated and cooled simultaneously.
Planets are always younger than stars. Stars are
younger than galactic nuclei. Galactic nuclei - than Nuclei of Supergalaxy.
Supergalaxy nuclei - than the Central Celestial Body of the Universe. More
ancient celestial bodies since the beginning of their existence are heated more
than the younger, since in their structure there were still a lot of heavy
chemical elements that do not have time to dissolve.
Radioactive decay processes in the Sun proceed more
intensively than in any other celestial body in our solar system.
Initially, after separation from the Nucleus of the Galaxy
our solar system was one body. Planets did not exist. This body revolved around
the Galactic Nucleus on interior galactic orbits. This body - a unified body of
the solar system received the emission from the Galactic Nucleus, caused by occurring
processes of radioactive decay. These processes take place there and now.
Stars are born due to the volcanic activity in the Nuclei
of Galaxies, planets – are caused by the volcanic activity in the bowels of
stars. Nuclei of galaxies are born from nuclei of supergalaxies. However, moons
orbiting planets are not the product of volcanic activity of planets. They
represent the ejections from stars.
The sun is the major primary source of “light” in our
solar system. In the depths of the Moon the processes of radioactive decay are
still weak and the whole liberated “energy” is absorbed by its own chemical
elements. Therefore, the Moon shines by reflected and transmitted solar “light”.
24. THE REASON OF
TIDES IS NOT GRAVITATION OF THE MOON, AND THE PRESSURE OF THE HEATED BY THE SUN
ATMOSPHERE
Let's talk about the causes of the tides, when every day
and every night the water of the world's ocean comes out on the dry land. On
the school bench, at physics lessons, students are forced to believe that
fluctuations of the water level are explained by attraction of the moon and the
sun taken one with another with the centrifugal forces of a rotating planet.
Not only pupils and students believe in this hypothesis. The vast majority of
scientists trust it.
In the officially adopted explaining of the tidal
hypothesis a number of issues cause bewilderment. In particular, occurrence of the
tide on the night side of the Earth does not explain by attraction of the moon
and the sun, in spite of all the tricks of the quirky human thought. According
to the logic on the night side there should not be the tide. But it exists. In
addition, the attraction must reject the mass of water in the direction of the attracting
celestial body (the Moon or the Sun), and not to force it to comes out on the
dry land. As you can see, already two factors do not find their confirmation in
the face of accepted theory, put forward by Sir Isaac Newton, and joyfully “eaten”
by public opinion.
Sure, attraction from the side of celestial bodies
affects the substance of the planet - rejects it. However, not this factor leads
to such substantial redistribution of water in the oceans, outward expression
of which is a tide of water to the dry land.
The Moon and the Sun of course attract the water of the
world ocean. But it should be remembered that the influence of the Sun is complex
- its poles attract (characterized by the Field of Attraction), and equatorial
regions repel (where the sun manifests outwardly the Field of Repulsion). The
Field of Repulsion of the Sun is not so great as to reach our planet. However,
the flux of photons of the Sun and of other types of particles falling to Earth
transmits to the substance of the planet energy (aka ether). “The transmission
of energy” - this is the impact of the Field of Repulsion. We can say that the Sun
affects by the Field of Repulsion indirectly through the flux of emitted
particles.
And now there is the most important thing in our
explanation of the causes of the tides.
The Field of Repulsion (energy) transmitted to the substance
of the planet by the flux of particles and heated by it, this is the reason of
onset of water on the land, i.e. of the tidal effect. Solar energy heats the
material of the atmosphere, is accumulated by chemical elements. The substance
expands when heated. Expanding gases of the atmosphere, combined
with accumulated solar particles emitting ether (with Field of Repulsion)
create the total Force of Pressure, which has an impact on water of the
planet's ocean - presses on it. Solar particles emitting ether increase
the atmospheric pressure because the pressure of the atmosphere - it is nothing
like the pressure of ether emitted by solar photons accumulated by chemical
elements of the atmosphere. Ether emitted by solar particles - is the total Field
of Repulsion formed in the atmosphere of the planet. This Field of Repulsion
affects the hydrosphere. I.e. we can say that the pressure of ether on the
water smoothes it, presses down. The water displaced water by pressure steps on
the dry land - so there is a high tide. The maximum tide should be
observed when the atmospheric pressure during the day is the most.
This proposed concept also well explains the fact of
occurrence of the tides on the opposite side of the planet. Water, having the property
of fluidity, being displaced by the pressure of ether, seeks into areas of the planet
where anything will not press on it – i.e. on the opposite side.
The first low tide is in the morning, when the sun
moves to the zenith. A number of solar photons falling on the Earth is more and
more, and the atmosphere emits more ether, which presses and displaces water. And
there occurs the tide of water to the land. At the same time there is a
redistribution of water in the oceans - the water rushes in those areas of the
world where the pressure on it will be less – i.e. on the night side of the
planet. And there is just the time of the night tide. And this tide is caused
by the pressure of ether at this moment on the opposite, the day side. I.e. the
night tide is caused by the redistribution of water, by extrusion, displacement
of its part from the day side to the night.
Pay attention to the following fact. The “moon”
hypothesis of Newton offers as a basis for explaining the rise of water (the
water shell of the planet) over the usual sea level. I.e. rise of water as a
result of its aspiration to the attracting celestial body.
Our hypothesis is based on the exactly opposite
mechanism - on the action not of attraction (gravity) and on repulsion
(antigravity). Hydrosphere is
flattened by the action of pressing on it ether. The displaced water is looking
for a place, moves closer to the night side, meets the land on the way – comes
out on it. And this is a tide.
A phase of the Moon, of course, plays a role in the
height of the tide. As you know, the greatest tide is at full moon and new
moon. Moreover at the full moon it is greater than in new moon. This fact is
quite easy to explain. At full moon and new moon the Moon is located on the
same straight line that passes through the centers of the Earth and the Sun. At
full moon it is behind the Earth. At new moon it’s in front of it. As a result,
in both cases the attraction of the moon enhances the attraction of the Earth.
The attraction of what? On what does this factor affect? This is important for attraction of
photons and other types of elementary particles. The Earth, as well as any
other planet or moon, affects by its attraction on particles emitted by the Sun
- it supports their inertial motion. There occurs a summing of Forces
- Inertia and Attraction. As a result, the total velocity of particles (solar
energy) becomes larger. The less number of them is absorbed by the substance
filling the space environment of the solar system. This means that more of them
reaches the planet and heats the material, in particular the atmosphere.
In general, you should never forget that our planet owes its heating to the Sun.
And this heat does not stop for a moment from the time when the planet was
formed from a substance ejected from the solar interior. So that the flow of
solar particles on the planet - it's a very important factor.
The more solar particles get into the atmosphere and are
accumulated in it, the more the total Field of Repulsion that occurs in the
heated atmosphere and displaces the water. In other words, the atmospheric
pressure increases.
The complex “Earth-Moon” when the moon is located on
the same straight line with the Earth and the Sun attracts with more Force of Attraction
than when the moon is at an angle to this line. At full moon and new moon the Force
of Attraction with which the Earth acts on solar particles increases. This is
thanks to summation with it of the gravitational field of the Moon. The rate of
flow of photons increases. The most number of them reaches the planet. And the
atmosphere is heated more. Generally we should not equate the heating of the
troposphere and the total heating of the atmosphere as a whole. In the lower
atmosphere it can rain. However, the total heating of the atmosphere, even in
the rain at the full moon and new moon will still be higher than on other days
of the month. And therefore the tide will be more.
It turns out that at new moon and full moon the
atmospheric pressure is higher than on other days. Moreover it’s higher at full
moon than at new moon. And all because at new moon the Moon is located in front
of the Earth and absorbs the most part of the solar radiation, picking its way
to the Earth. However, a large percentage of particles overcomes the attraction
of the moon and passes by it successfully, because the Earth's gravity is more
than lunar. I.e. even though there is absorption of a significant number of
particles, the Moon manages to do its “good work” and attract the solar
particles, to support their movement to the Earth.
That's the whole secret of a great tide at full moon
and new moon.
25. CEPHEIDS ARE DOUBLE STARS
We offer you the following hypothesis concerning the
nature of Cepheids - variable stars. These stars periodically change their
brightness.
The star becomes or larger in diameter and colder
(dims), or smaller and hotter.
Cepheid (star with variable brightness) - this is a
double star. In this system in the center there is located a star that since
its formation has in its composition more of chemical elements. Because of
this, its mass is greater and the brightness (luminance) is too. A star-satellite
rotates around it. It’s sparser, colder. It turns around like the Moon around
the Earth. This star originally contained a less number of chemical elements.
Due to the lower transmutation the luminosity is less too. The substance of
such star is better heated by radiation of the Nucleus of Galaxy – it accumulates
more photons. This is because the total number of chemical elements is less.
And so it’s sparser – and due to this diameter of the star is bigger.
Degree of transmutation (transformation) of chemical
elements in the star is the more, the more the total number of elements in its
composition, and the more the total Field of Attraction of the star.
Transmutation (transformation) - is another name for the temperature rise.
Scientists still can’t explain what the meaning of the phenomenon of
temperature is. Proposed by us Law of Transformation logically explains this
physical phenomenon.
But we a little digress from the topic of the article.
Although this was done deliberately - to recall the meaning of transmutation.
Particles in the chemical elements transmute - change
their quality - thanks to receipt of excessive amount of ether.
The more chemical elements are in the composition of
celestial body, the higher the degree of transformation of the particles in the
composition of its elements. The more elements are in the star, the greater its
overall temperature is.
Hence the smaller star brightness with fewer
chemicals.
On the contrary - the larger star emits brighter.
That's why periodic eclipse of the less large (and
therefore less bright) star by the larger (and more colorful) perceived by the
observer from the side as change of brightness.
After all, the observer is far away. And he does not know
precisely – is this a single star or a system of two objects. From here and all
misunderstandings and divination of astronomers - what does appear before their
eyes?
Our proposed explanation of the nature of Cepheids can
prove the following fact.
As we know from the history of astronomy, Miss
Henrietta Leviticus discovered the connection between the brightness of
variable stars and the duration of the period of changes in brightness for
stars of Magellanic Cloud. According to her observations, the greater
brightness, the longer periods of normal brightness and reduced.
Magellanic Cloud - is another galaxy. Star cluster
generated by another Nucleus of Galaxy, and revolving around it, also as our
stars are turning around our Nucleus (and formed from its substance).
The brighter the star is, the greater the period of
brightness change.
This fact can be explained as follows.
Stars in the composition of Galaxies - are the same as
planets in the solar system.
The stars with the largest number of chemical elements
are located at the periphery of any Galaxy. Also as giant planets – i.e. the
most large – are located on the periphery of the solar system.
These stars are hotter because they are large. If you
remember, the more particles in the conglomerate, the more the warming -
transmutation. Accumulating radiation (photons) from the Nucleus of Galaxy
stars rotate faster. Since the speed of rotation depends on the heating
temperature of the atmosphere (if it exists) and of underlying hydrosphere and
lithosphere. If the atmosphere does not exist or if it is extremely rarefied – it
depends on the heating temperature of the surface layers - as it is the case of
Mercury.
The heating temperature of the surface layer depends
on two factors - the total temperature of the star (or of the planet) and on
the amount of falling radiation. The farther the star is from the Nucleus of Galaxy,
the less radiation it receives. Although the number of accumulated photons in
it is more and more – namely because it is moving away. But, nevertheless, it
is falling energy causes a star (as a planet) to rotate. And at a certain
distance from the Nucleus of Galaxy rotation of the star begins to slow down
again. As it’s in the case of planets. I.e. at first the rotational speed of
planets (and stars) gradually increases and then begins to fall. We can see
this by the example of the planets in our solar system.
Those stars of Magellanic Cloud that are most of all closer
to us look brighter. And they rotate more slowly compared with the stars a
little closer to the Nucleus. Again it’s the analogy with planets.
Rotating Field of Attraction (ethereal stream) of star,
Nucleus or any other celestial body is the cause of rotation of planets around it
(stars - in the case of Galaxy). Ethereal stream moves in the direction of the biggest
lack of ether – i.e. toward the nearest star. And planets consisting of
particles and being immersed in the ethereal field move along with the stream –
are attracted. Since the star rotates on its axis – ethereal stream (Field of
Attraction) takes the form of a spiral. And planets, respectively, are moving
along the same trajectory. More precisely, they are moving in a circle. But they
would move in a spiral, and would have fallen onto the star ... if not
heating of them by energy emitted by the star. Namely this heating does not let
them fall. Do you remember the torment of physicists associated with the “need” of
falling of electron onto the nucleus of the atom? In the case of
planets the situation is similar. The planets must fall on the Sun. Because the
Law of Gravity is relentless. And they do not fall just because the star emits
energy (particles). If it did not radiate - it would fall. But the young star
and star of "middle-aged" can’t but radiate. As for the luminary
“aged”, then sooner or later it will ebb. But that's another topic that is
covered in other articles.
So the planets are held around the star and turn it
around due to the gravity. But they do not fall onto the sun thanks to
antigravity.
The same can be said of stars in the Galaxy. They do
not fall onto the Nucleus for the same reasons - antigravity. This is the Field
of Repulsion arising in the surface layers of the star. Emitted ether.
Any celestial body does not fall on its body-grandparent
because repelled by ethereal Field of antigravity.
However, we are greatly distracted from the central
theme of the article - from explaining the nature of the Cepheids.
Star turns around the nucleus of the galaxy due to the
rotation of this Nucleus.
With regard to the mechanism of rotation of the star-satellite,
then it is different. It is completely analogous to the rotation of the Moon
around the Earth. The star satellite turns around not because of aspirations in
the Field of Attraction. The orbit of the satellite can even be located not in
the equatorial region of the central star. Like our Moon and its orbit.
The star-satellite is heated by radiation of the Nucleus
of Galaxy. Like the moon is heated by solar radiation.
The heating leads to emergence of Field of Repulsion
on the heated side of the star-satellite. If the star was single, it just would
revolve around its axis. But this star system is double. And there is an
attraction from the side of the larger star. I.e. on the one hand the heated
side of the star-satellite “wants” to move away from the Galactic Nucleus. And
on the other hand the star is held by the attraction of the central star. It is
this attraction does not allow the star-satellite just to turn around itself.
And it still has one option - to start to move away entirely. I.e. not heated
region turns away from the Nucleus and the whole star is moving away. In the
case of the Moon the same thing happens.
That’s how it happens – the movement of the
star-satellite. It just “replaced” the
rotation on the periodic distancing and then approaching to the Nucleus of Galaxy.
And the “fault” of this is attraction from the central star.
When we look at the night sky, watching the stars
within our galaxy, we can’t on the basis of only one brightness judge about their
distance to the center of the Galaxy. And this is because our sun (and we with it)
is also located within the boundaries of the Galaxy. Now, if we look at another
galactic system, such as Magellanic Cloud (or any other), then we can say with
confidence that any star in its composition exactly is not part of the
structure of our Galaxy.
Only parallax can with sufficient accuracy tell us the
location of the star relative to the observer.
Generally the closer the star is, the brighter its
light is. However, also the larger it is, the brighter it is. So two stars may
be located at different distances from us (and from the center). But their
brightness will be the same if one that farther from us – is larger, and the
one that is closer - smaller.
The structure of any Galaxy is similar to the
structure of any solar system. In the center is a large celestial body-grandparent.
Celestial bodies of smaller size generated by it turn around it, moved by gyre
of the ethereal stream of attraction. In the case of a Galaxy - the stars
revolve around the Nucleus. In the case of a solar system - planets turn around
the star, the sun. Pieces of ice of frozen gases of the atmosphere of the giant
planets, forming rings in total - are also the prototypes of the planets or
stars, moving in a circle.
So everything is built by a single scheme. As below,
so above. This is not surprising. The principle structure is repeated. Only
scale changes.
Biggest stars born first.
As also from the bowels of any star the largest planets
are ejected first.
In the future, these stars (planets) took place on the
periphery of the galaxy (the solar system) and are named giants - stars or
planets. Luminosity of giant stars is the greatest (about sparse red giants we
are not talking). It’s namely thanks to their scale – i.e. thanks to the total
number of their constituent chemical elements. The reasons for this dependence we
discussed earlier in this article.
So we can confidently say - the largest (in general)
and brightest (on the whole) stars are located on the periphery of any galaxy.
Not all, of course, but the overall percentage of them - yes.
So when Miss Henrietta Leviticus eyed Magellanic
Cloud, she could be argued (if she would know our hypothesis) that in general
in any galaxy, which is viewed from the side (as you know, we are not talking
about our galaxy, which we can’t see from outside), the brightest stars are
also the nearest to us. And it’s all because the biggest stars are on the periphery.
The biggest - not thanks to the sparseness and volume. More precisely - not thanks
only to this reason. They are the biggest - because from birth they contain
many chemical elements.
And less bright stars of an alien galaxy in general
have less size (less chemical elements in the composition) and are located further.
Let’s summarize.
Cepheid - is a star system consisting of two stars. The star with larger diameter and less bright rotates
around the central star, less large and brighter. This star-satellite
periodically eclipses the central star. Because of this, from the side the
eclipse period is perceived by the observer as dimming. We prove this point of
view throughout this article.
The more the main magnitude of brightness of the star,
the longer the period of the reduced brightness, and the following period of
normal brightness.
The main value of the star's brightness is brightness
is the central star. The period of the reduced brightness is a brightness of a
star-satellite.
The closer to the periphery of the Galaxy, the
brighter stars are located there.
And the slower the rotational speed of all stars is.
And the slower the turning of satellites around the
central stars is.
The reasons for this deceleration we have considered
in detail in the beginning of this article.
And since the farther from the Nucleus, the less the
intensity of radiation reaching the stars, so the heating of the surface layers
(responsible for the emergence and increase of Field of Repulsion) is carried
out longer than for stars closer to the Nucleus. And because the speed is less with
which the star-satellite is moving away from the Nucleus, at the same time
turning around the central star.
Have you understood the main idea?
The farther to the periphery of Galaxy, the slower the
movement of the star-satellite.
After all, it is an explanation for the fact of relationship
between brightness of Cepheids and duration of periods of changes in
brightness.
The star-satellite moves slowly because it is slowly
heated by radiation of the Galaxy Nucleus.
Thank you for your attention!
The contact
information https://authorcentral.amazon.com/gp/books?ie=UTF8&pn=irid58388648
danina.t@yandex.ru - e-mail
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/tatiana.danina
Vkontakte: https://vk.com/t.danina
The books of the series “The Teaching of
Djwhal Khul – Esoteric Natural Science” - “The main occult laws and
concepts” - http://www.amazon.com/Main-Occult-Laws-Concepts
-ebook/dp/B00GUJJR72
“Ethereal mechanics” - http://www.amazon.com/The-Doctrine-Djwhal-Khul-mechanics-ebook/dp/B00I8KSY8Y (paperback - https://www.createspace.com/4836813)
“New Esoteric Astrology,
1” - http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00JF6RMCY
(paperback - https://www.createspace.com/4827294)
“Thermodynamics” - http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00KGHK8EU (paperback - https://www.createspace.com/4838412)
And
here is the book of my grandpa, Michael Novikov, a military paramedic.
You can read his memories about the Finnish war http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00JYDITQ6
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий