THE DISPUTE BETWEEN THEORIES OF HEATING AND COOLING THE PLANET

THE DISPUTE BETWEEN THEORIES OF HEATING AND COOLING THE PLANET

A theme of global warming is one of the most popular issues currently being debated not only in scientific but also in the social circles. However, this issue is inextricably linked with the theme of ice ages. Yes, warmings and coolings because happening now in the world global warming is not the first in the history of the Earth. As well as the Ice Age was not the only one.

The theme of cooling and warming is closely intertwined with another scientific problem. A very long time (at least throughout the XX century) in science, there is a dispute between supporters of two concepts. Some people believe that the Earth cools, others – that it is heated. This question is really very difficult to analyze because both we have to consider at the same time an incredibly large number of astronomical, climatic, physical, chemical and biological factors. And besides in addition to the dispute between supporters of heating and cooling there is another division of opinion - within the concept of warming earth. Some scientists attribute the warming of the Earth to the action of only physicochemical factors - for example, of "heat generation due to gravitational compression of the planet". Others blame only “the human factor” – i.e. an increasing of "greenhouse effect" due to the growing in atmospheric levels of carbon dioxide in the combustion of various fuels.

Let's look who is right – i.e. is the Earth cool or heat, and what causes of one or the other. And we will say immediately - as it is often in science (and not only in science) the truth includes all (or almost all) existing points of view, at first glance, seeming contradictory. All the matter is that the Earth simultaneously heats and cools. Heating causes are as natural physicochemical factors, both natural and anthropogenic. Plus - biological.

After the Earth was formed from the solar material – it has been thrown out of the sun in outer space in the form of a giant drop of hot matter - it began to cool. The fact is that when the substance of the planet was in the depths of the Sun it was subjected to more significant transformation by gravitation much greater than it happens in the depths of the planets themselves.

So, the surface of arising planet first began to cool. Interior of the Earth (and of any other planet) cool down much less because to center the planet degree of transformation of elementary particles in chemical elements by means of gravitation increase.

So, the planets after leaving the Sun (star) start to cool, and primarily the surface layers exposed to the cooling. As you can see proponents of cooling the Earth are right - but only on half.

However, after leaving the Sun the planets begin to be exposed to such a powerful heating factor as elementary particles emitted by the Sun. Any star heats up "its" planets with the help of emitted elementary particles. The heating is provided in two ways:

1) Collisions of emitted particles with chemical elements in the composition of the planet;

2) Chemical elements of the planet accumulate (absorb) solar particles. More than half of reaching the planet solar elementary particles has Repulsion Fields. Most of them are the photons with Repulsion Fields belonging to the radio, micro frequency and visible ranges. Just this kind of particles with Repulsion Fields accumulated by chemical elements in the composition of the planet increase the total temperature of chemical elements.

These two ways of heating the particles of the planet by the solar particles differ from each other by the time during which the elevated temperature persists. We can consider a collision as a short-term way to raise the temperature. While accumulation (absorption) of particles with Repulsion Fields - it's not just a long-term way, and the way leading to the total heating substance of the planet not disappearing with time. It is this second factor has a major warming effect.

Solar particles meeting on the way the planet behave differently. They all follow influenced by the Field of Attraction of the planet. Some part of them is reflected immediately as a result of collisions with chemical elements of the planet. Other - remains in the upper layers of the atmosphere as a part of the ionosphere. Third - is absorbed by elements of all layers of the atmosphere. Fourth – is absorbed by elements of solid and liquid substances on the surface of the planet. However, ultimately the fate of most particles absorbed by the elements - to move from element to element, down toward the planet's center, subject to the action of its attraction.

By the way, the cooling of the surface layers of the planet, which happens every night, in cold weather, in cold climate and during the cold season caused by the fact that accumulated by elements solar particles with Repulsion Fields go down towards the center of the planet. And new solar particles at this time or do not come at all (at night), or come a little (in the cold season, in cold climates, and in cold weather). But this cold - it's just the return of chemical elements in the surface layers of the planet to their natural state, which is inherent for them out of the process of transformation by the solar particles.

It turns out that supporters of both concepts are right in their own way. Leaving the Sun the planets cooled though not completely. To the center - the temperature is maintained at a high level, although lower than it was when the substance was part of the Sun. However, the cooling of the planets is prevented the heating them by the particles with Fields of Repulsion emitted by the Sun. Solar particles "settle" in the first turn, in the center of the planets. The farther from the center, the less solar particles are accumulated in the elements, so to the periphery of the planets the temperature of substance decreases. Although we should not forget that to the center of any celestial body temperature rises due to the transformation by gravity.

People need to stop blaming others and themselves that someone or something disturbs them to exist. We just survive and adapt. We do not know for what we are doing this, but that is the whole point of our lives. The life is so mysterious. Each of us has own view of the world, but in general this knowledge is negligible. And we do not realize of what we are the part. We can say a million times - "God", "Creator". But this is not one iota reveal to us the essence of this Aught. So why we do not just go through life knowing that everything is subject to change. And if you're unhappy now, it does not mean that it always will be.

As you will soon know, the people - these are especial animals, and we are ordained our own path of development.