CEPHEIDS ARE DOUBLE STARS

CEPHEIDS ARE DOUBLE STARS

We offer you the following hypothesis concerning the nature of Cepheids - variable stars. These stars periodically change their brightness.

The star becomes or larger in diameter and colder (dims), or smaller and hotter.

Cepheid (star with variable brightness) - this is a double star. In this system in the center there is located a star that since its formation has in its composition more of chemical elements. Because of this, its mass is greater and the brightness (luminance) is too. A star-satellite rotates around it. It’s sparser, colder. It turns around like the Moon around the Earth. This star originally contained a less number of chemical elements. Due to the lower transmutation the luminosity is less too. The substance of such star is better heated by radiation of the Nucleus of Galaxy – it accumulates more photons. This is because the total number of chemical elements is less. And so it’s sparser – and due to this diameter of the star is bigger.

Degree of transmutation (transformation) of chemical elements in the star is the more, the more the total number of elements in its composition, and the more the total Field of Attraction of the star. Transmutation (transformation) - is another name for the temperature rise. Scientists still can’t explain what the meaning of the phenomenon of temperature is. Proposed by us Law of Transformation logically explains this physical phenomenon.

But we a little digress from the topic of the article. Although this was done deliberately - to recall the meaning of transmutation.

Particles in the chemical elements transmute - change their quality - thanks to receipt of excessive amount of ether.

The more chemical elements are in the composition of celestial body, the higher the degree of transformation of the particles in the composition of its elements. The more elements are in the star, the greater its overall temperature is.

Hence the smaller star brightness with fewer chemicals.

On the contrary - the larger star emits brighter. 

That's why periodic eclipse of the less large (and therefore less bright) star by the larger (and more colorful) perceived by the observer from the side as change of brightness.

After all, the observer is far away. And he does not know precisely – is this a single star or a system of two objects. From here and all misunderstandings and divination of astronomers - what does appear before their eyes?

Our proposed explanation of the nature of Cepheids can prove the following fact.

As we know from the history of astronomy, Miss Henrietta Leviticus discovered the connection between the brightness of variable stars and the duration of the period of changes in brightness for stars of Magellanic Cloud. According to her observations, the greater brightness, the longer periods of normal brightness and reduced.

Magellanic Cloud - is another galaxy. Star cluster generated by another Nucleus of Galaxy, and revolving around it, also as our stars are turning around our Nucleus (and formed from its substance).

The brighter the star is, the greater the period of brightness change.

This fact can be explained as follows.

Stars in the composition of Galaxies - are the same as planets in the solar system.

The stars with the largest number of chemical elements are located at the periphery of any Galaxy. Also as giant planets – i.e. the most large – are located on the periphery of the solar system.

These stars are hotter because they are large. If you remember, the more particles in the conglomerate, the more the warming - transmutation. Accumulating radiation (photons) from the Nucleus of Galaxy stars rotate faster. Since the speed of rotation depends on the heating temperature of the atmosphere (if it exists) and of underlying hydrosphere and lithosphere. If the atmosphere does not exist or if it is extremely rarefied – it depends on the heating temperature of the surface layers - as it is the case of Mercury.

The heating temperature of the surface layer depends on two factors - the total temperature of the star (or of the planet) and on the amount of falling radiation. The farther the star is from the Nucleus of Galaxy, the less radiation it receives. Although the number of accumulated photons in it is more and more – namely because it is moving away. But, nevertheless, it is falling energy causes a star (as a planet) to rotate. And at a certain distance from the Nucleus of Galaxy rotation of the star begins to slow down again. As it’s in the case of planets. I.e. at first the rotational speed of planets (and stars) gradually increases and then begins to fall. We can see this by the example of the planets in our solar system.

Those stars of Magellanic Cloud that are most of all closer to us look brighter. And they rotate more slowly compared with the stars a little closer to the Nucleus. Again it’s the analogy with planets.

Rotating Field of Attraction (ethereal stream) of star, Nucleus or any other celestial body is the cause of rotation of planets around it (stars - in the case of Galaxy). Ethereal stream moves in the direction of the biggest lack of ether – i.e. toward the nearest star. And planets consisting of particles and being immersed in the ethereal field move along with the stream – are attracted. Since the star rotates on its axis – ethereal stream (Field of Attraction) takes the form of a spiral. And planets, respectively, are moving along the same trajectory. More precisely, they are moving in a circle. But they would move in a spiral, and would have fallen onto the star ... if not heating of them by energy emitted by the star. Namely this heating does not let them fall. Do you remember the torment of physicists associated with the “need” of falling of electron onto the nucleus of the atom? In the case of planets the situation is similar. The planets must fall on the Sun. Because the Law of Gravity is relentless. And they do not fall just because the star emits energy (particles). If it did not radiate - it would fall. But the young star and star of "middle-aged" can’t but radiate. As for the luminary “aged”, then sooner or later it will ebb. But that's another topic that is covered in other articles.

So the planets are held around the star and turn it around due to the gravity. But they do not fall onto the sun thanks to antigravity.

The same can be said of stars in the Galaxy. They do not fall onto the Nucleus for the same reasons - antigravity. This is the Field of Repulsion arising in the surface layers of the star. Emitted ether.

Any celestial body does not fall on its body-grandparent because repelled by ethereal Field of antigravity.

However, we are greatly distracted from the central theme of the article - from explaining the nature of the Cepheids.

Star turns around the nucleus of the galaxy due to the rotation of this Nucleus.

With regard to the mechanism of rotation of the star-satellite, then it is different. It is completely analogous to the rotation of the Moon around the Earth. The star satellite turns around not because of aspirations in the Field of Attraction. The orbit of the satellite can even be located not in the equatorial region of the central star. Like our Moon and its orbit.

The star-satellite is heated by radiation of the Nucleus of Galaxy. Like the moon is heated by solar radiation.

The heating leads to emergence of Field of Repulsion on the heated side of the star-satellite. If the star was single, it just would revolve around its axis. But this star system is double. And there is an attraction from the side of the larger star. I.e. on the one hand the heated side of the star-satellite “wants” to move away from the Galactic Nucleus. And on the other hand the star is held by the attraction of the central star. It is this attraction does not allow the star-satellite just to turn around itself. And it still has one option - to start to move away entirely. I.e. not heated region turns away from the Nucleus and the whole star is moving away. In the case of the Moon the same thing happens.

That’s how it happens – the movement of the star-satellite.  It just “replaced” the rotation on the periodic distancing and then approaching to the Nucleus of Galaxy. And the “fault” of this is attraction from the central star.

When we look at the night sky, watching the stars within our galaxy, we can’t on the basis of only one brightness judge about their distance to the center of the Galaxy. And this is because our sun (and we with it) is also located within the boundaries of the Galaxy. Now, if we look at another galactic system, such as Magellanic Cloud (or any other), then we can say with confidence that any star in its composition exactly is not part of the structure of our Galaxy.

Only parallax can with sufficient accuracy tell us the location of the star relative to the observer.

Generally the closer the star is, the brighter its light is. However, also the larger it is, the brighter it is. So two stars may be located at different distances from us (and from the center). But their brightness will be the same if one that farther from us – is larger, and the one that is closer - smaller.

The structure of any Galaxy is similar to the structure of any solar system. In the center is a large celestial body-grandparent. Celestial bodies of smaller size generated by it turn around it, moved by gyre of the ethereal stream of attraction. In the case of a Galaxy - the stars revolve around the Nucleus. In the case of a solar system - planets turn around the star, the sun. Pieces of ice of frozen gases of the atmosphere of the giant planets, forming rings in total - are also the prototypes of the planets or stars, moving in a circle.

So everything is built by a single scheme. As below, so above. This is not surprising. The principle structure is repeated. Only scale changes. 

Biggest stars born first.

As also from the bowels of any star the largest planets are ejected first.

In the future, these stars (planets) took place on the periphery of the galaxy (the solar system) and are named giants - stars or planets. Luminosity of giant stars is the greatest (about sparse red giants we are not talking). It’s namely thanks to their scale – i.e. thanks to the total number of their constituent chemical elements. The reasons for this dependence we discussed earlier in this article.

So we can confidently say - the largest (in general) and brightest (on the whole) stars are located on the periphery of any galaxy. Not all, of course, but the overall percentage of them - yes.

So when Miss Henrietta Leviticus eyed Magellanic Cloud, she could be argued (if she would know our hypothesis) that in general in any galaxy, which is viewed from the side (as you know, we are not talking about our galaxy, which we can’t see from outside), the brightest stars are also the nearest to us. And it’s all because the biggest stars are on the periphery. The biggest - not thanks to the sparseness and volume. More precisely - not thanks only to this reason. They are the biggest - because from birth they contain many chemical elements.

And less bright stars of an alien galaxy in general have less size (less chemical elements in the composition) and are located further.

Let’s summarize.

Cepheid - is a star system consisting of two stars. The star with larger diameter and less bright rotates around the central star, less large and brighter. This star-satellite periodically eclipses the central star. Because of this, from the side the eclipse period is perceived by the observer as dimming. We prove this point of view throughout this article.

The more the main magnitude of brightness of the star, the longer the period of the reduced brightness, and the following period of normal brightness.

The main value of the star's brightness is brightness is the central star. The period of the reduced brightness is a brightness of a star-satellite.

The closer to the periphery of the Galaxy, the brighter stars are located there.

And the slower the rotational speed of all stars is.

And the slower the turning of satellites around the central stars is.

The reasons for this deceleration we have considered in detail in the beginning of this article. 

And since the farther from the Nucleus, the less the intensity of radiation reaching the stars, so the heating of the surface layers (responsible for the emergence and increase of Field of Repulsion) is carried out longer than for stars closer to the Nucleus. And because the speed is less with which the star-satellite is moving away from the Nucleus, at the same time turning around the central star.

Have you understood the main idea?

The farther to the periphery of Galaxy, the slower the movement of the star-satellite.

After all, it is an explanation for the fact of relationship between brightness of Cepheids and duration of periods of changes in brightness.

The star-satellite moves slowly because it is slowly heated by radiation of the Galaxy Nucleus.

Thank you for your attention!

The contact information https://authorcentral.amazon.com/gp/books?ie=UTF8&pn=irid58388648

danina.t@yandex.ru  - e-mail

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/tatiana.danina

Vkontakte: https://vk.com/t.danina

The books of the series “The Teaching of Djwhal Khul – Esoteric Natural Science” - “The main occult laws and concepts” - http://www.amazon.com/Main-Occult-Laws-Concepts -ebook/dp/B00GUJJR72

(paperback - http://www.amazon.com/The-Teaching-Djwhal-Khul-concepts/dp/1499625421

“Ethereal mechanics” - http://www.amazon.com/The-Doctrine-Djwhal-Khul-mechanics-ebook/dp/B00I8KSY8Y  (paperback - https://www.createspace.com/4836813) 

“New Esoteric Astrology, 1” - http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00JF6RMCY (paperback - https://www.createspace.com/4827294)

“Thermodynamics” - http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00KGHK8EU  (paperback - https://www.createspace.com/4838412)

And here is the book of my grandpa, Michael Novikov, a military paramedic. You can read his memories about the Finnish war http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00JYDITQ6

(paperback - http://www.amazon.com/Memories-Russian-Military-Paramedic-Michael/dp/1499786115)

   

THE REASON OF TIDES IS NOT GRAVITATION OF THE MOON, AND THE PRESSURE OF THE HEATED BY THE SUN ATMOSPHERE

THE REASON OF TIDES IS NOT GRAVITATION OF THE MOON, AND THE PRESSURE OF THE HEATED BY THE SUN ATMOSPHERE

Let's talk about the causes of the tides, when every day and every night the water of the world's ocean comes out on the dry land. On the school bench, at physics lessons, students are forced to believe that fluctuations of the water level are explained by attraction of the moon and the sun taken one with another with the centrifugal forces of a rotating planet. Not only pupils and students believe in this hypothesis. The vast majority of scientists trust it.

In the officially adopted explaining of the tidal hypothesis a number of issues cause bewilderment. In particular, occurrence of the tide on the night side of the Earth does not explain by attraction of the moon and the sun, in spite of all the tricks of the quirky human thought. According to the logic on the night side there should not be the tide. But it exists. In addition, the attraction must reject the mass of water in the direction of the attracting celestial body (the Moon or the Sun), and not to force it to comes out on the dry land. As you can see, already two factors do not find their confirmation in the face of accepted theory, put forward by Sir Isaac Newton, and joyfully “eaten” by public opinion.

Sure, attraction from the side of celestial bodies affects the substance of the planet - rejects it. However, not this factor leads to such substantial redistribution of water in the oceans, outward expression of which is a tide of water to the dry land.

The Moon and the Sun of course attract the water of the world ocean. But it should be remembered that the influence of the Sun is complex - its poles attract (characterized by the Field of Attraction), and equatorial regions repel (where the sun manifests outwardly the Field of Repulsion). The Field of Repulsion of the Sun is not so great as to reach our planet. However, the flux of photons of the Sun and of other types of particles falling to Earth transmits to the substance of the planet energy (aka ether). “The transmission of energy” - this is the impact of the Field of Repulsion. We can say that the Sun affects by the Field of Repulsion indirectly through the flux of emitted particles.

And now there is the most important thing in our explanation of the causes of the tides.

The Field of Repulsion (energy) transmitted to the substance of the planet by the flux of particles and heated by it, this is the reason of onset of water on the land, i.e. of the tidal effect. Solar energy heats the material of the atmosphere, is accumulated by chemical elements. The substance expands when heated. Expanding gases of the atmosphere, combined with accumulated solar particles emitting ether (with Field of Repulsion) create the total Force of Pressure, which has an impact on water of the planet's ocean - presses on it. Solar particles emitting ether increase the atmospheric pressure because the pressure of the atmosphere - it is nothing like the pressure of ether emitted by solar photons accumulated by chemical elements of the atmosphere. Ether emitted by solar particles - is the total Field of Repulsion formed in the atmosphere of the planet. This Field of Repulsion affects the hydrosphere. I.e. we can say that the pressure of ether on the water smoothes it, presses down. The water displaced water by pressure steps on the dry land - so there is a high tide. The maximum tide should be observed when the atmospheric pressure during the day is the most.

This proposed concept also well explains the fact of occurrence of the tides on the opposite side of the planet. Water, having the property of fluidity, being displaced by the pressure of ether, seeks into areas of the planet where anything will not press on it – i.e. on the opposite side.

The first low tide is in the morning, when the sun moves to the zenith. A number of solar photons falling on the Earth is more and more, and the atmosphere emits more ether, which presses and displaces water. And there occurs the tide of water to the land. At the same time there is a redistribution of water in the oceans - the water rushes in those areas of the world where the pressure on it will be less – i.e. on the night side of the planet. And there is just the time of the night tide. And this tide is caused by the pressure of ether at this moment on the opposite, the day side. I.e. the night tide is caused by the redistribution of water, by extrusion, displacement of its part from the day side to the night.

Pay attention to the following fact. The “moon” hypothesis of Newton offers as a basis for explaining the rise of water (the water shell of the planet) over the usual sea level. I.e. rise of water as a result of its aspiration to the attracting celestial body.

Our hypothesis is based on the exactly opposite mechanism - on the action not of attraction (gravity) and on repulsion (antigravity). Hydrosphere is flattened by the action of pressing on it ether. The displaced water is looking for a place, moves closer to the night side, meets the land on the way – comes out on it. And this is a tide.

A phase of the Moon, of course, plays a role in the height of the tide. As you know, the greatest tide is at full moon and new moon. Moreover at the full moon it is greater than in new moon. This fact is quite easy to explain. At full moon and new moon the Moon is located on the same straight line that passes through the centers of the Earth and the Sun. At full moon it is behind the Earth. At new moon it’s in front of it. As a result, in both cases the attraction of the moon enhances the attraction of the Earth. The attraction of what? On what does this factor affect? This is important for attraction of photons and other types of elementary particles. The Earth, as well as any other planet or moon, affects by its attraction on particles emitted by the Sun - it supports their inertial motion. There occurs a summing of Forces - Inertia and Attraction. As a result, the total velocity of particles (solar energy) becomes larger. The less number of them is absorbed by the substance filling the space environment of the solar system. This means that more of them reaches the planet and heats the material, in particular the atmosphere. In general, you should never forget that our planet owes its heating to the Sun. And this heat does not stop for a moment from the time when the planet was formed from a substance ejected from the solar interior. So that the flow of solar particles on the planet - it's a very important factor.

The more solar particles get into the atmosphere and are accumulated in it, the more the total Field of Repulsion that occurs in the heated atmosphere and displaces the water. In other words, the atmospheric pressure increases.

The complex “Earth-Moon” when the moon is located on the same straight line with the Earth and the Sun attracts with more Force of Attraction than when the moon is at an angle to this line. At full moon and new moon the Force of Attraction with which the Earth acts on solar particles increases. This is thanks to summation with it of the gravitational field of the Moon. The rate of flow of photons increases. The most number of them reaches the planet. And the atmosphere is heated more. Generally we should not equate the heating of the troposphere and the total heating of the atmosphere as a whole. In the lower atmosphere it can rain. However, the total heating of the atmosphere, even in the rain at the full moon and new moon will still be higher than on other days of the month. And therefore the tide will be more.

It turns out that at new moon and full moon the atmospheric pressure is higher than on other days. Moreover it’s higher at full moon than at new moon. And all because at new moon the Moon is located in front of the Earth and absorbs the most part of the solar radiation, picking its way to the Earth. However, a large percentage of particles overcomes the attraction of the moon and passes by it successfully, because the Earth's gravity is more than lunar. I.e. even though there is absorption of a significant number of particles, the Moon manages to do its “good work” and attract the solar particles, to support their movement to the Earth.

That's the whole secret of a great tide at full moon and new moon.

FORMATION OF PLANETS IN THE SOLAR SYSTEM

FORMATION OF PLANETS IN THE SOLAR SYSTEM

There are many hypotheses of origin and formation of planets of the solar system. Let’s take a close look on one of them, as it is the closest to reality. It was proposed by the Soviet scientist, Academician Vasily Fesenko. He suggested that the planets may have “solar origin”.

Everything is correctly. Planets are formed from material ejected by the star during its heating by radioactive decay of heavy chemical elements in its composition.

Giant planets differ from the terrestrial planets only by their huge thick atmosphere. Under the atmosphere there must exist as solids planets, like the terrestrial planets.

Terrestrial planets are the product of Sun’s ejection in a cooled down state as compared with the earlier and hotter state when there was an ejection of substance “for” giant planets. The earlier Sun contained a greater number of heavy elements. Consequently, the substance from which the giant planets formed contained more of heavy elements. Therefore, radioactive decay processes in the bowels of giant planets were more intense. As a result, they have accumulated more “energy”" – i.e. have warmed stronger. Therefore, their chemical elements are in a sparse state of aggregation.

Terrestrial planets formed from material ejected by the Sun in the later periods of its existence. By then the Sun had already lost much of its heavy chemical elements - the source of “energy” - radioactively decayed to lighter elements. Therefore, the substance of the terrestrial planets was less rich in heavy elements compared with the material “for” giant planets. Hence - the lower intensity of the radioactive decay processes in terrestrial planets and less amount of accumulated “energy”. And therefore there is a more dense aggregate state.

All planets are heated and cooled simultaneously.

They are heated due to emission of “energy” in the process of radioactive decay of heavy elements. And due to getting of the “energy” emitted by a star into the cosmic space.

Planets are cooled for the same reason that all other celestial objects - due to radiation of “energy” into space.

Radius of all planets increases toward the equator and decreases to the poles. And the gravitational field decreases to the equator and increases to the poles. The reason is the additional heating of chemical elements caused by the “energy” obtained from the Sun. Solar “energy” integrates into the “voids” in elements, leading to additional shielding of nuclei of elements and reducing their mass. Reducing the mass of the body - is increasing its Force of Attraction and decrease of the Force of Repulsion. That's why closer to the equator the planet more “swells” and its gravitational field (Power of Attraction) is less.

Not only the planets, but also all other celestial bodies are heated and cooled simultaneously.

Planets are always younger than stars. Stars are younger than galactic nuclei. Galactic nuclei - than Nuclei of Supergalaxy. Supergalaxy nuclei - than the Central Celestial Body of the Universe. More ancient celestial bodies since the beginning of their existence are heated more than the younger, since in their structure there were still a lot of heavy chemical elements that do not have time to dissolve.

Radioactive decay processes in the Sun proceed more intensively than in any other celestial body in our solar system.

Initially, after separation from the Nucleus of the Galaxy our solar system was one body. Planets did not exist. This body revolved around the Galactic Nucleus on interior galactic orbits. This body - a unified body of the solar system received the emission from the Galactic Nucleus, caused by occurring processes of radioactive decay. These processes take place there and now.

Stars are born due to the volcanic activity in the Nuclei of Galaxies, planets – are caused by the volcanic activity in the bowels of stars. Nuclei of galaxies are born from nuclei of supergalaxies. However, moons orbiting planets are not the product of volcanic activity of planets. They represent the ejections from stars.

The sun is the major primary source of “light” in our solar system. In the depths of the Moon the processes of radioactive decay are still weak and the whole liberated “energy” is absorbed by its own chemical elements. Therefore, the Moon shines by reflected and transmitted solar “light”.

WHAT IS A COMET?

WHAT IS A COMET?

Belts of comets, which apparently exist beyond the orbit of Pluto, are the same as the rings of the giant planets - frozen atmosphere of the Sun. The ice blocks of different sizes.

As meteorites can knock out of rings the individual chunks of ice, and larger celestial bodies (asteroids) can knock out the ice blocks from the belts of comets. A block can be knocked out at the collision in the direction of the Sun. The sun begins to attract it. So there arises a comet.

THE REASON OF ABSENCE OF THE ATMOSPHERE ON THE MOON

THE REASON OF ABSENCE OF THE ATMOSPHERE ON THE MOON

Our moon like the rest of the bodies in our solar system is an ejection of solar material. It was "captured" by the Earth and began to rotate around it. And it was formed around the same time as Earth. Therefore, it consists initially the same percentage of heavy elements, as in the composition of the earth – that is larger than in Venus and Mercury, but less than in the giant planets. Due to the larger number of chemical elements constituting the earth, the absolute number of heavy elements in its composition initially was more than that in the composition of the moon. Therefore, the processes of radioactive decay in the Earth proceed more intensively than in the bowels of the Moon. As a result, during the radioactive decay the Moon produces less light elements than Earth. This, and the fact that the number of elements of the Moon is less than the number of elements of the Earth and, consequently, the total gravity field is weaker causes that this small amount of gases that formed in the bowels of the moon is not held by the gravitational field.

But on many satellites of Jupiter, for example, on Io, the atmosphere exists. This is explained by the fact that the solar substance from which these satellites formed was rich in heavy elements (like substance of the giant planets themselves).

A COMMENTARY TO THE COSMOLOGICAL HYPOTHESIS

A COMMENTARY TO THE COSMOLOGICAL HYPOTHESIS

The basis of modern cosmological concepts is the notion that hydrogen and helium - the lightest of the known chemical elements – are served as "building blocks" from which during the process of thermonuclear fusion all heavier chemical elements were created. It is also believed that the source of "energy" emitted by the sun is still the same thermonuclear fusion.

However, this theory of emergence of heavy elements from lighter has a significant disadvantage.

Hydrogen and helium are very light due to the fact that their Force of Attraction is small and Force of Repulsion is large enough. If the Force of Attraction is small, there is no reason that could "make" chemical elements to merge with each other, forming thus the elements with a large number of heavy elementary particles in nuclei - that is, the heavy elements.

But the process of arising of light chemical elements (with less massive nuclei) from heavier (with more massive nuclei) is quite likely.

Once again we focus on the important point. The mass of a chemical element can change both due to changes in the mass of the nucleus, and by changing the quantity and quality of the "energy" in the "voids" of element.

THE FINAL GOAL OF THE EVOLUTION OF LIFE ON THE EARTH

THE FINAL GOAL OF THE EVOLUTION OF LIFE ON THE EARTH

In the bowels of massive and simultaneously large celestial bodies in the process of radioactive decay there occurs a birth of chemical elements with lighter nuclei. During this process the Force of Attraction of the chemical elements is reduced, and the Force of Repulsion grows. The distance between the chemical elements increases. This means that the substance in the depths of heavenly bodies is expanding. Light chemical elements are pulled out during volcanic activity from the depths on the surface of a celestial body. The lightest chemical elements such as hydrogen and helium because of the small Force of Attraction and large Force of Repulsion move away from the planet's surface so far that they are not held even in the gas shell of the planet - the atmosphere. We can say they “fly into space”. Other heavier chemical elements remain on the surface of the celestial body. The more massive is a celestial body, the more “energy” is released in its depths. "Energy" liberated during radioactive decay moves between the chemical elements on the surface of a celestial body. During the moving between elements the "energy" integrates into the "voids" of chemical elements themselves, heating them and thereby preventing the formation of chemical compounds or destroying of existing ones.

The purpose of the evolution of life on Earth is to create beings who could become carriers of chemical elements the composition of which would be attended by elementary particles of all Plans. Esoteric name for the chemical element is "Soul" and "The Fifth Element". Soul is born from the "marriage of Matter and Spirit". So it happens in reality. "Matter" is heavy elementary particles. "The Spirit" is light elementary particles. Those and others are present in the composition of chemical elements. In chemical elements of any kingdom - mineral, vegetable, animal or human - "Matter" is elementary particles of the lower, most dense layers of the Physical Plan. "Spirit" for the chemical elements of each kingdom is its own. For chemical elements of the mineral kingdom "Spirit" is elementary particles of the higher, ethereal layers of the Physical Plan. For chemical elements of the vegetable kingdom "Spirit" is particles of the Astral Plan. For the Animal Kingdom – particles of the Mental Plan. For Human Kingdom – particles of Buddhic Plan. Chemical elements containing astral particles are included only in the DNA of each cell. Mental and buddhic particles are the part only of the DNA molecules of neurons of different departments of the nervous system of animals and humans. Chemical elements of all other molecules (not DNA) in the composition of bodies of plants, animals and people refer to the mineral kingdom. The bodies of creatures of the Fifth, superhuman kingdom will develop on the basis of human bodies. But the heart of the bodies of superhumans will also be chemical elements of the mineral kingdom.